Naoum Joseph J, Silberfein Eric J, Zhou Wei, Sweeney John F, Albo Daniel, Brunicardi F Charles, Kougias Panagiotis, El Sayed Hosam F, Lin Peter H
Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine & Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston VAMC (112), 2002 Holcomb Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):713-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.09.043.
Although laparoscopic splenectomy has become the preferred treatment of choice for hematologic-related splenic disorders, intraoperative blood loss remains a common occurrence. In an effort to reduce this risk, we evaluate the potential role and clinical outcome of concomitant intraoperative splenic artery embolization and laparoscopic splenectomy.
Between June 2000 and July 2005, 18 patients with hematologically related splenic disorders underwent combined intraoperative splenic artery embolization and laparoscopic splenectomy (group 1). For comparison, we studied 18 age- and gender-matched case controls undergoing same operations during the same period (group 2). Intraoperative data and clinical outcome were compared between the 2 groups.
Technical success was 100% in group 1. One patient in group 2 was converted to open splenectomy because of severe blood loss, resulting in a technical success rate of 95%. The mean splenic size in group 1 and group 2 was 15.5 +/- 4.7 cm (range, 12-23 cm) and 15.7 +/- 6.8 (range, 11-24 cm), respectively (not significant [NS]). Mean operative time in group 1 and group 2 was 175 minutes and 162 minutes, respectively (NS). Significantly less intraoperative blood loss was noted in group 1 (mean, 25 mL; range, 15-63 mL) compared with group 2 (mean, 240 mL; range, 150-420 mL; P < .003). There was an even greater difference in blood loss between the 2 groups when the splenic size was greater than 18 cm (mean 35 mL in group 1 versus 350 mL in group 2, P < .001). No differences were noted in postoperative recovery, return of bowel function, or length of hospital stay between the 2 groups.
Concomitant splenic artery embolization and laparoscopic splenic reduced operative blood loss when compared with laparoscopic splenectomy procedure alone. Splenic artery embolization is a useful intraoperative adjunctive procedure that should be considered in patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy for hematologic disorders who are Jehovah's Witness or with significant hypersplenism because of benefit of reduced blood loss.
尽管腹腔镜脾切除术已成为血液系统相关脾脏疾病的首选治疗方法,但术中失血仍是常见情况。为降低这种风险,我们评估了术中同期脾动脉栓塞术与腹腔镜脾切除术的潜在作用及临床效果。
2000年6月至2005年7月,18例血液系统相关脾脏疾病患者接受了术中同期脾动脉栓塞术与腹腔镜脾切除术(第1组)。作为对照,我们研究了同期接受相同手术的18例年龄和性别匹配的病例(第2组)。比较两组的术中数据及临床效果。
第1组技术成功率为100%。第2组1例患者因严重失血转为开腹脾切除术,技术成功率为95%。第1组和第2组脾脏平均大小分别为15.5±4.7 cm(范围12 - 23 cm)和15.7±6.8(范围11 - 24 cm)(无显著差异[NS])。第1组和第2组平均手术时间分别为175分钟和162分钟(NS)。与第2组(平均240 mL;范围150 - 420 mL)相比,第1组术中失血量显著减少(平均25 mL;范围15 - 63 mL;P <.003)。当脾脏大小大于18 cm时,两组失血量差异更大(第1组平均35 mL,第2组平均350 mL,P <.001)。两组术后恢复、肠功能恢复或住院时间均无差异。
与单纯腹腔镜脾切除术相比,同期脾动脉栓塞术与腹腔镜脾切除术可减少术中失血量。脾动脉栓塞术是一种有用的术中辅助手术,对于因宗教信仰(耶和华见证会成员)或因显著脾功能亢进而行腹腔镜脾切除术治疗血液系统疾病的患者,考虑到其减少失血的益处,应予以采用。