Suppr超能文献

肝细胞癌经皮诊断和治疗方法后的种植转移。风险和结果是什么?肝细胞癌经皮治疗方法的种植转移风险。

Seeding following percutaneous diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma. What is the risk and the outcome? Seeding risk for percutaneous approach of HCC.

作者信息

Stigliano R, Marelli L, Yu D, Davies N, Patch D, Burroughs A K

机构信息

Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Medicine Unit, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, NW3 2QG London, UK.

出版信息

Cancer Treat Rev. 2007 Aug;33(5):437-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2007.04.001. Epub 2007 May 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tumour biopsy is usually considered mandatory for patient management by oncologists. Currently percutaneous ablation is used therapeutically for cirrhotic patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), not suitable for resection or waiting for liver transplantation. However malignant seeding is a recognized complication of both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in patients with HCC. Although percutaneous therapy whether with or without biopsy of a suspected HCC nodule may minimize the risk of seeding, this has not been confirmed.

AIM

To evaluate the risk of seeding, defined as new neoplastic disease occurring outside the liver capsule, either in the subcutaneous tissue or peritoneal cavity following needle biopsy and/or local ablation therapy (LAT).

METHODS

A literature search resulted in 179 events in 99 articles between January 1983 and February 2007: 66 seedings followed liver biopsy, 26 percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), 1 microwave, 22 radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and 64 after combined biopsy and percutaneous treatment (5 microwave; 33 PEI; 26 RFA).

RESULTS

In 41 papers specifying the total number of patients biopsied and/or treated, the median risk of seeding was 2.29% (range 0-11%) for biopsy group; 1.4% (1.15-1.85%) for PEI when used with biopsy and 0.61% (0-5.56%) for RFA without biopsy, 0.95% (0-12.5%) for RFA with biopsy and 0.72% (0-10%) for liver nodules (including non-HCC nodules) biopsied and ablated.

CONCLUSION

Risk of seeding with HCC is substantial and appears greater with using diagnostic biopsy alone compared to therapeutic percutaneous procedures. This risk is particularly relevant for patients being considered for liver transplantation.

摘要

背景

肿瘤活检通常被肿瘤学家视为患者管理的必要手段。目前,经皮消融术被用于治疗不适合手术切除或等待肝移植的肝硬化小肝细胞癌(HCC)患者。然而,恶性肿瘤种植是HCC患者诊断和治疗过程中公认的并发症。尽管无论是否对疑似HCC结节进行活检,经皮治疗都可能将种植风险降至最低,但这一点尚未得到证实。

目的

评估肿瘤种植的风险,即针吸活检和/或局部消融治疗(LAT)后,肝脏包膜外的皮下组织或腹腔内出现新的肿瘤性疾病。

方法

文献检索发现,1983年1月至2007年2月期间的99篇文章中有179例事件:66例种植发生在肝脏活检后,26例发生在经皮乙醇注射(PEI)后,1例发生在微波治疗后,22例发生在射频消融(RFA)后,64例发生在活检和经皮治疗联合应用后(5例微波;33例PEI;26例RFA)。

结果

在41篇明确了活检和/或治疗患者总数的论文中,活检组种植的中位风险为2.29%(范围0 - 11%);活检时联合应用PEI的种植风险为1.4%(1.15 - 1.85%),未进行活检的RFA种植风险为0.61%(0 - 5.56%),进行活检的RFA种植风险为0.95%(0 - 12.5%),对肝脏结节(包括非HCC结节)进行活检和消融的种植风险为0.72%(0 - 10%)。

结论

HCC患者的肿瘤种植风险很大,与单纯诊断性活检相比,单纯经皮治疗性操作的种植风险似乎更高。这种风险对于考虑肝移植的患者尤为重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验