• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉-触觉扫视反应时间中的空间效应建模

Modeling spatial effects in visual-tactile saccadic reaction time.

作者信息

Diederich Adele, Colonius Hans

机构信息

School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

Percept Psychophys. 2007 Jan;69(1):56-67. doi: 10.3758/bf03194453.

DOI:10.3758/bf03194453
PMID:17515216
Abstract

Saccadic reaction time (SRT) to visual targets tends to be shorter when nonvisual stimuli are presented in close temporal or spatial proximity, even when subjects are instructed to ignore the accessory input. Here, we investigate visual-tactile interaction effects on SRT under varying spatial configurations. SRT to bimodal stimuli was reduced by up to 30 msec, in comparison with responses to unimodal visual targets. In contrast to previous findings, the amount of multisensory facilitation did not decrease with increases in the physical distance between the target and the nontarget but depended on (1) whether the target and the nontarget were presented in the same hemifield (ipsilateral) or in different hemifields (contralateral), (2) the eccentricity of the stimuli, and (3) the frequency of the vibrotactile nontarget. The time-window-of-integration (TWIN) model for SRT (Colonius & Diederich, 2004) is shown to yield an explicit characterization of the observed multisensory spatial interaction effects through the removal of the peripheral-processing effects of stimulus location and tactile frequency.

摘要

当非视觉刺激在时间或空间上接近呈现时,即使受试者被指示忽略辅助输入,对视觉目标的扫视反应时间(SRT)往往会更短。在此,我们研究了在不同空间配置下视觉-触觉相互作用对SRT的影响。与对单峰视觉目标的反应相比,对双峰刺激的SRT减少了多达30毫秒。与先前的研究结果相反,多感官促进的程度并没有随着目标与非目标之间物理距离的增加而降低,而是取决于:(1)目标和非目标是在同一半视野(同侧)还是在不同半视野(对侧)呈现;(2)刺激的偏心率;以及(3)振动触觉非目标的频率。结果表明,用于SRT的整合时间窗口(TWIN)模型(Colonius & Diederich,2004)通过消除刺激位置和触觉频率的外周处理效应,对观察到的多感官空间相互作用效应进行了明确的表征。

相似文献

1
Modeling spatial effects in visual-tactile saccadic reaction time.视觉-触觉扫视反应时间中的空间效应建模
Percept Psychophys. 2007 Jan;69(1):56-67. doi: 10.3758/bf03194453.
2
Visual-tactile spatial interaction in saccade generation.扫视生成中的视觉-触觉空间交互。
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Feb;148(3):328-37. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1302-7. Epub 2002 Nov 20.
3
Why two "Distractors" are better than one: modeling the effect of non-target auditory and tactile stimuli on visual saccadic reaction time.为何两个“干扰项”优于一个:模拟非目标听觉和触觉刺激对视觉眼跳反应时间的影响
Exp Brain Res. 2007 May;179(1):43-54. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0768-0. Epub 2007 Jan 10.
4
When a high-intensity "distractor" is better then a low-intensity one: modeling the effect of an auditory or tactile nontarget stimulus on visual saccadic reaction time.当高强度“干扰物”比低强度“干扰物”更具优势时:模拟听觉或触觉非目标刺激对视觉眼跳反应时间的影响。
Brain Res. 2008 Nov 25;1242:219-30. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.081. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
5
Visual-auditory interaction in saccadic reaction time: effects of auditory masker level.扫视反应时间中的视听觉交互作用:听觉掩蔽水平的影响
Brain Res. 2008 Jul 18;1220:150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.08.034. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
6
Multisensory interaction in saccadic reaction time: a time-window-of-integration model.扫视反应时间中的多感官交互:一种整合时间窗口模型。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Jul-Aug;16(6):1000-9. doi: 10.1162/0898929041502733.
7
Time-window-of-integration (TWIN) model for saccadic reaction time: effect of auditory masker level on visual-auditory spatial interaction in elevation.用于眼跳反应时间的整合时间窗口(TWIN)模型:听觉掩蔽水平对垂直方向上视觉-听觉空间交互作用的影响
Brain Topogr. 2009 May;21(3-4):177-84. doi: 10.1007/s10548-009-0091-8. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
8
Assessing age-related multisensory enhancement with the time-window-of-integration model.用整合时间窗口模型评估与年龄相关的多感官增强。
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Aug;46(10):2556-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.026. Epub 2008 Apr 12.
9
Crossmodal interaction in speeded responses: time window of integration model.快速反应中的跨通道交互:整合模型的时间窗口
Prog Brain Res. 2009;174:119-35. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)01311-9.
10
Crossmodal interaction in saccadic reaction time: separating multisensory from warning effects in the time window of integration model.扫视反应时间中的跨模态交互作用:在整合模型的时间窗口内区分多感官效应与警告效应
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;186(1):1-22. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1197-4. Epub 2007 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Multisensory-driven facilitation within the peripersonal space is modulated by the expectations about stimulus location on the body.躯体感觉空间内的多感觉驱动促进作用受对身体上刺激位置的预期调节。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 21;12(1):20061. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21469-w.
2
To bridge or not to bridge the multisensory time gap: bimanual coordination to sound and touch with temporal lags.是否弥合多感官时间间隔:存在时间延迟时双手与声音和触觉的协调
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Jan;235(1):135-151. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4776-4. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
3
Prior knowledge of spatiotemporal configuration facilitates crossmodal saccadic response : A TWIN analysis.
时空配置的先验知识有助于跨模态扫视反应:一项双胞胎分析。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jul;234(7):2059-2076. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4609-5. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
4
Keeping in touch with the visual system: spatial alignment and multisensory integration of visual-somatosensory inputs.与视觉系统保持联系:视觉-躯体感觉输入的空间对齐和多感官整合
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 5;6:1068. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01068. eCollection 2015.
5
Attention modulates visual-tactile interaction in spatial pattern matching.注意力在空间模式匹配中调节视觉与触觉的相互作用。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 9;9(9):e106896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106896. eCollection 2014.
6
The construct of the multisensory temporal binding window and its dysregulation in developmental disabilities.多感官时间绑定窗口的构建及其在发育障碍中的失调。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Nov;64:105-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
7
Designing driver assistance systems with crossmodal signals: multisensory integration rules for saccadic reaction times apply.利用跨模态信号设计驾驶员辅助系统:适用于扫视反应时间的多感官整合规则
PLoS One. 2014 May 6;9(5):e92666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092666. eCollection 2014.
8
Focused attention vs. crossmodal signals paradigm: deriving predictions from the time-window-of-integration model.集中注意力与跨模态信号范式:从整合时间窗口模型中得出预测。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2012 Aug 29;6:62. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00062. eCollection 2012.
9
Computing an optimal time window of audiovisual integration in focused attention tasks: illustrated by studies on effect of age and prior knowledge.计算集中注意力任务中视听整合的最佳时间窗口:通过研究年龄和先验知识的影响来说明。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jul;212(3):327-37. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2732-x. Epub 2011 May 31.
10
The optimal time window of visual-auditory integration: a reaction time analysis.视觉-听觉整合的最佳时间窗口:反应时间分析。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2010 May 11;4:11. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2010.00011. eCollection 2010.