Pantalos George M, Giridharan Guruprasad, Colyer Jeff, Mitchell Michael, Speakman Jeff, Lucci Chris, Johnson Greg, Gartner Mark, Koenig Steven C
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Bioengineering, Cardiovascular Innovation Institute, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40202, USA.
ASAIO J. 2007 May-Jun;53(3):385-91. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e318050d210.
Pediatric ventricular assist devices are being developed that can produce pulsatile flow (PF) or continuous flow (CF). An important aspect of choosing between these two modes is understanding the consequences of each mode on pediatric vascular pulsatility. Differences in vascular pulsatility generated by PF and CF operation of the 3-inch pediatric cardiopulmonary assist system (pCAS, Ension, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA) were investigated while providing left atrium-to-aorta left ventricular assist (LVA), using an infant animal model of left ventricular dysfunction. Hemodynamic data were digitally recorded with the pCAS providing LVA at incremental flow rates while operating in continuous mode, pulsatile mode at 100 bpm, and pulsatile mode at 140 bpm. These data were used to calculate vascular input impedance (Zart), energy equivalent pressure, and surplus hemodynamic energy as indices of pulsatility for partial (50% of maximum) and maximum LVA flow. Both CF and PF LVA by the pCAS resulted in favorable hemodynamic rectification of left ventricular dysfunction while generating equivalent flows. PF LVA maintained a greater degree of pulsatility compared with CF, as evidenced by increasing energy equivalent pressure and a lesser drop in surplus hemodynamic energy with increasing pCAS flow. Differences in Zart modulus and phase were indiscernible. The selection of flow mode may have long-term consequences on Zart and end-organ perfusion affecting clinical outcomes in pediatric patients.
正在研发能够产生搏动性血流(PF)或连续性血流(CF)的儿科心室辅助装置。在这两种模式之间进行选择的一个重要方面是了解每种模式对儿科血管搏动性的影响。在使用左心室功能障碍的幼小动物模型提供左心房到主动脉的左心室辅助(LVA)时,研究了3英寸儿科心肺辅助系统(pCAS,Ension公司,匹兹堡,宾夕法尼亚州)的PF和CF操作所产生的血管搏动性差异。在连续模式、100次/分钟搏动模式和140次/分钟搏动模式下,以递增流速通过pCAS提供LVA时,对血流动力学数据进行数字记录。这些数据用于计算血管输入阻抗(Zart)、能量等效压力和剩余血流动力学能量,作为部分(最大流量的50%)和最大LVA流量搏动性的指标。pCAS的CF和PF LVA在产生等效流量的同时,均能对左心室功能障碍进行良好的血流动力学纠正。与CF相比,PF LVA保持了更高程度的搏动性,随着pCAS流量增加,能量等效压力增加以及剩余血流动力学能量下降幅度较小证明了这一点。Zart模量和相位的差异难以辨别。血流模式的选择可能对Zart和终末器官灌注产生长期影响,从而影响儿科患者的临床结局。