Suppr超能文献

自动注意并不等同于自动恐惧:无内隐效价的优先注意。

Automatic attention does not equal automatic fear: preferential attention without implicit valence.

作者信息

Purkis Helena M, Lipp Ottmar V

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Queensland, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Emotion. 2007 May;7(2):314-23. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.314.

Abstract

Theories of nonassociative fear acquisition hold that humans have an innate predisposition for some fears, such as fear of snakes and spiders. This predisposition may be mediated by an evolved fear module (Ohman & Mineka, 2001) that responds to basic perceptual features of threat stimuli by directing attention preferentially and generating an automatic fear response. Visual search and affective priming tasks were used to examine attentional processing and implicit evaluation of snake and spider pictures in participants with different explicit attitudes; controls (n = 25) and snake and spider experts (n = 23). Attentional processing and explicit evaluation were found to diverge; snakes and spiders were preferentially attended to by all participants; however, they were negative only for controls. Implicit evaluations of dangerous and nondangerous snakes and spiders, which have similar perceptual features, differed for expert participants, but not for controls. The authors suggest that although snakes and spiders are preferentially attended to, negative evaluations are not automatically elicited during this processing.

摘要

非联想性恐惧习得理论认为,人类对某些恐惧具有先天倾向,例如对蛇和蜘蛛的恐惧。这种倾向可能由一个进化而来的恐惧模块介导(奥曼和米内卡,2001),该模块通过优先引导注意力并产生自动恐惧反应来对威胁刺激的基本感知特征做出反应。视觉搜索和情感启动任务被用于研究不同明确态度的参与者对蛇和蜘蛛图片的注意力加工和内隐评价;对照组(n = 25)以及蛇和蜘蛛专家组(n = 23)。研究发现注意力加工和明确评价存在差异;所有参与者都优先关注蛇和蜘蛛;然而,只有对照组对它们持负面态度。对于具有相似感知特征的危险和非危险蛇及蜘蛛的内隐评价,专家参与者之间存在差异,但对照组不存在差异。作者认为,尽管蛇和蜘蛛会被优先关注,但在此加工过程中不会自动引发负面评价。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验