• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦虑与认知表现:注意力控制理论

Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory.

作者信息

Eysenck Michael W, Derakshan Nazanin, Santos Rita, Calvo Manuel G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Emotion. 2007 May;7(2):336-53. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336.

DOI:10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336
PMID:17516812
Abstract

Attentional control theory is an approach to anxiety and cognition representing a major development of Eysenck and Calvo's (1992) processing efficiency theory. It is assumed that anxiety impairs efficient functioning of the goal-directed attentional system and increases the extent to which processing is influenced by the stimulus-driven attentional system. In addition to decreasing attentional control, anxiety increases attention to threat-related stimuli. Adverse effects of anxiety on processing efficiency depend on two central executive functions involving attentional control: inhibition and shifting. However, anxiety may not impair performance effectiveness (quality of performance) when it leads to the use of compensatory strategies (e.g., enhanced effort; increased use of processing resources). Directions for future research are discussed.

摘要

注意控制理论是一种关于焦虑与认知的研究方法,它是艾森克和卡尔沃(1992)的加工效率理论的一个主要发展。该理论假定,焦虑会损害目标导向注意系统的有效运作,并增加加工过程受刺激驱动注意系统影响的程度。除了降低注意控制外,焦虑还会增加对威胁相关刺激的注意。焦虑对加工效率的负面影响取决于涉及注意控制的两种中央执行功能:抑制和转换。然而,当焦虑导致使用补偿策略(如增强努力;增加加工资源的使用)时,它可能不会损害绩效有效性(绩效质量)。文中还讨论了未来的研究方向。

相似文献

1
Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory.焦虑与认知表现:注意力控制理论
Emotion. 2007 May;7(2):336-53. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336.
2
Effects of anxiety on attentional allocation and task performance: an information processing analysis.焦虑对注意力分配和任务表现的影响:一项信息加工分析。
Behav Res Ther. 1997 Dec;35(12):1101-11.
3
The neural correlates of cognitive effort in anxiety: effects on processing efficiency.焦虑认知努力的神经相关性:对加工效率的影响。
Biol Psychol. 2011 Mar;86(3):337-48. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.12.013. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
4
Processing efficiency in preschoolers' memory span: individual differences related to age and anxiety.学龄前儿童记忆广度的加工效率:与年龄和焦虑相关的个体差异
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 May;103(1):30-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
5
Development of attentional processes in ADHD and normal children.多动症儿童与正常儿童注意力过程的发展
Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:259-76. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17614-8.
6
Threat-relevance impairs executive functions: negative impact on working memory and response inhibition.威胁相关性会损害执行功能:对工作记忆和反应抑制的负面影响。
Emotion. 2012 Apr;12(2):384-93. doi: 10.1037/a0027305.
7
Attentional control deficits in trait anxiety: why you see them and why you don't.特质焦虑的注意力控制缺陷:为什么你能看到它们,以及为什么你看不到。
Biol Psychol. 2013 Mar;92(3):440-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
8
Attentional capture and trait anxiety: evidence from inhibition of return.注意捕获与特质焦虑:来自返回抑制的证据。
J Anxiety Disord. 2009 Aug;23(6):782-90. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.03.002. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
9
Effects of trait anxiety and situational stress on attentional shifting are buffered by working memory capacity.特质焦虑和情境压力对注意力转移的影响会受到工作记忆容量的缓冲。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2015;28(1):1-16. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2014.911846. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
10
Genetic analyses of the stability of executive functioning during childhood.儿童期执行功能稳定性的遗传分析
Biol Psychol. 2007 Sep;76(1-2):11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.05.002. Epub 2007 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanisms of Virtual Reality-Based Relaxation in Older Adults: A Scoping Review.老年人基于虚拟现实的放松机制:一项范围综述。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 29;14(17):6126. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176126.
2
Bidirectional Dynamics Between Stress-Reactive Rumination and Negative Affect: Evidence From a Multimethods Study in Individuals With High Trait Anxiety.应激反应性反刍思维与消极情绪之间的双向动态关系:来自一项针对高特质焦虑个体的多方法研究的证据。
Depress Anxiety. 2025 Sep 2;2025:2503361. doi: 10.1155/da/2503361. eCollection 2025.
3
Neural Basis of Anxiety in Dementia With Lewy Bodies.
路易体痴呆中焦虑的神经基础
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025 Sep;40(9):e70150. doi: 10.1002/gps.70150.
4
The influence of college students' psychological resilience on problem solving: based on eye tracking technology.大学生心理韧性对问题解决的影响:基于眼动追踪技术
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 15;16:1616452. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1616452. eCollection 2025.
5
Threat context impairs cognitive control of neutral words processing in social anxiety individuals: evidence from ERP and theta oscillations.威胁情境会损害社交焦虑个体对中性词加工的认知控制:来自ERP和θ振荡的证据。
BMC Neurosci. 2025 Aug 28;26(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12868-025-00976-2.
6
Anxiety and Depression are Associated with More Distorted Thinking on Social Media: A Longitudinal Multi-Method Study.焦虑和抑郁与社交媒体上更多的扭曲思维有关:一项纵向多方法研究。
Cognit Ther Res. 2025 Aug;49(4):712-720. doi: 10.1007/s10608-025-10580-7. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
7
From Senses to Memory During Childhood: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis Exploring Multisensory Processing and Working Memory Development.童年期从感知到记忆:一项探索多感官加工与工作记忆发展的系统综述和贝叶斯元分析
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):157. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15080157.
8
Electrophysiological evidence of processing social threat words in social anxiety participants.社交焦虑参与者对社交威胁词汇进行加工的电生理证据。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 26;25(1):821. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07257-6.
9
Perseverative Negative Thinking, Self-Control, and Executive Functioning in Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Competing Models.抑郁和焦虑症状中的强迫性消极思维、自我控制与执行功能:竞争模型的综合荟萃分析
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Jul 12. doi: 10.1177/21677026251344172.
10
Evidence of differences in diurnal electrodermal, temperature and heart rate patterns by mental health status in free-living data.在自由生活数据中,按心理健康状况划分的昼夜皮肤电活动、体温和心率模式差异的证据。
BMJ Ment Health. 2025 Aug 17;28(1):e301307. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301307.