Poitras Stéphane, Blais Régis, Swaine Bonnie, Rossignol Michel
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Jun;13(3):412-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00725.x.
Although physiotherapists (PTs) are one of the health professionals most involved in the treatment of back pain, their practice patterns have not been well studied. The study objectives were to identify the practice patterns of PTs treating workers suffering from acute/subacute back pain, with and without radiating pain below the knee, and to assess the relationship between these patterns and characteristics of PTs.
PTs working in private clinics in the province of Quebec, Canada were invited to participate. Each PT used a self-administered questionnaire to record, for each treatment session, treatment objectives, interventions used and education given to two workers with back pain, one without radiating pain (n = 189 PTs) and one with radiating pain (n = 136 PTs). Multiple correspondence analysis with hierarchical classification was used to identify practice patterns of PTs. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to assess the relationship between practice patterns and PTs characteristics.
For workers without radiating pain, 51.9% of PTs focused their treatment on soft tissue mobilizations/massage and heat, 24.3% focused on the McKenzie approach and related interventions, and 23.8% focused on exercises and function. Similar results were found for workers with radiating pain. Most of the PT characteristics were not related to practice patterns.
The practices of PTs appeared to be separated into three distinct patterns. These practice variations suggest that there may be disagreement or uncertainty among PTs in the management of work-related back pain. The lack of evidence for the majority of interventions used by PTs and the difficulties of integrating evidence into clinical practice may be possible explanations.
尽管物理治疗师(PT)是参与背痛治疗的医疗专业人员之一,但其执业模式尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是确定治疗患有急性/亚急性背痛且伴有或不伴有膝以下放射性疼痛的工人的物理治疗师的执业模式,并评估这些模式与物理治疗师特征之间的关系。
邀请在加拿大魁北克省私人诊所工作的物理治疗师参与。每位物理治疗师使用一份自我管理的问卷,记录每次治疗过程中的治疗目标、所采用的干预措施以及对两名背痛工人(一名无放射性疼痛,n = 189名物理治疗师;一名有放射性疼痛,n = 136名物理治疗师)提供的教育。采用带有层次分类的多重对应分析来确定物理治疗师的执业模式。使用多项逻辑回归来评估执业模式与物理治疗师特征之间的关系。
对于无放射性疼痛的工人,51.9%的物理治疗师将治疗重点放在软组织松动术/按摩和热疗上,24.3%的物理治疗师将重点放在麦肯齐方法及相关干预措施上,23.8%的物理治疗师将重点放在锻炼和功能方面。有放射性疼痛的工人也得到了类似结果。大多数物理治疗师的特征与执业模式无关。
物理治疗师的执业行为似乎分为三种不同模式。这些执业差异表明,在与工作相关的背痛管理方面,物理治疗师之间可能存在分歧或不确定性。物理治疗师使用的大多数干预措施缺乏证据,以及将证据整合到临床实践中的困难可能是原因。