Awada Ahmad, Zhang Steven, Gil Thierry, de Valeriola Dominique, Lalami Yassine, De Porre Peter, Piccart-Gebhart Martine J
Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 May;23(5):991-1003. doi: 10.1185/030079907x178810.
This phase I study assessed the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of combined tipifarnib and docetaxel treatment in patients with advanced solid malignancies.
The study protocol was sensitive to myelosuppression, as both drugs have been associated with this adverse event. Due to myelosuppression incidence, and in order to determine the MTD of docetaxel, multiple treatment regimens were employed. Tipifarnib was administered orally at 200 or 300 mg, twice daily (BID) for 21 days, 14 days, or 7 days for multiple 21-day cycles; intravenous (i.v.) docetaxel was administered on day 1 of each cycle at 60, 75, or 85 mg/m2.
A total of 36 patients entered into the study. For each drug, MTDs were identified (tipifarnib: 300 mg BID for 14 days with 60 mg/m2 docetaxel; tipifarnib: 200 mg BID for 14 days with 75 mg/m2 docetaxel). The major dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, particularly febrile neutropenia (44%). Mutual pharmacokinetic interactions (the effect of docetaxel on tipifarnib pharmacokinetics and the effect of tipifarnib on docetaxel pharmacokinetics) were not evident, as maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) values of both tipifarnib and docetaxel were similar (p > or = 0.43) whether the two drugs were concomitantly administered or not. Seven of 31 evaluable patients (23%) had an objective response, 11 (35%) had stable disease (six > or = 24 weeks), and the overall clinical benefit rate (objective response and/or stable disease > or = 24 weeks) was 42%.
Although the high incidence of febrile neutropenia necessitated a multiple scheduling adaptation of tipifarnib compared to the original protocol, the apparent lack of mutual pharmacokinetic interactions, the ability to coadminister tipifarnib and docetaxel near single-agent MTDs, and suggestive evidence of efficacy make this drug combination attractive for further examination.
本I期研究评估了联合使用替匹法尼和多西他赛治疗晚期实体恶性肿瘤患者的最大耐受剂量(MTD)、安全性、药代动力学和疗效。
由于两种药物均与骨髓抑制这一不良事件相关,因此研究方案对骨髓抑制较为敏感。鉴于骨髓抑制的发生率,并为了确定多西他赛的MTD,采用了多种治疗方案。替匹法尼以200或300mg口服,每日两次(BID),持续21天、14天或7天,进行多个21天周期的治疗;静脉注射(i.v.)多西他赛在每个周期的第1天以60、75或85mg/m²给药。
共有36名患者进入研究。每种药物的MTD均已确定(替匹法尼:14天每日两次300mg联合60mg/m²多西他赛;替匹法尼:14天每日两次200mg联合75mg/m²多西他赛)。主要剂量限制性毒性为骨髓抑制,尤其是发热性中性粒细胞减少(44%)。相互药代动力学相互作用(多西他赛对替匹法尼药代动力学的影响以及替匹法尼对多西他赛药代动力学的影响)并不明显,因为无论两种药物是否同时给药,替匹法尼和多西他赛的最大血浆浓度(Cmax)和血清浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)值均相似(p≥0.43)。31名可评估患者中有7名(23%)出现客观缓解,11名(35%)病情稳定(6名≥24周),总体临床获益率(客观缓解和/或病情稳定≥24周)为42%。
尽管发热性中性粒细胞减少的高发生率使得与原方案相比需要对替匹法尼的给药方案进行多次调整,但明显缺乏相互药代动力学相互作用、能够在接近单药MTD的情况下联合使用替匹法尼和多西他赛以及提示有疗效的证据使得这种药物组合具有吸引力,值得进一步研究。