Suppr超能文献

高剂量与低剂量氟康唑疗法对重症监护病房高危患者疑似侵袭性念珠菌病的经验性治疗:一项成本效益分析。

High- versus low-dose fluconazole therapy for empiric treatment of suspected invasive candidiasis among high-risk patients in the intensive care unit: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

作者信息

Chen Hua, Suda Katie J, Turpin Robin S, Pai Manjunath P, Bearden David T, Garey Kevin W

机构信息

University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 May;23(5):1057-65. doi: 10.1185/030079907x182130.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-dose fluconazole is an alternative for patients with candidemia caused by Candida glabrata or other Candida species with decreased fluconazole susceptibility. However, empiric high-dose fluconazole is not currently recommended and may result in higher drug costs and toxicity.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of using empiric high-dose fluconazole in intensive care unit (ICU) with suspected invasive candidiasis.

DESIGN

Decision analytic model.

TARGET POPULATION

ICU patients with suspected invasive candidiasis.

TIME HORIZON

Lifetime.

PERSPECTIVE

Societal.

INTERVENTIONS

Low-dose fluconazole (loading dose of 800 mg followed by 400 mg daily) vs. high-dose fluconazole (loading dose of 1600 mg followed by 800 mg daily). Generic fluconazole costs were used for the analysis.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Incremental life expectancy and incremental cost per discounted life year (DLY) saved. RESULT OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Based on current national levels of fluconazole resistance and ability to correctly identify patients with candidemia, high-dose fluconazole was the more effective but more expensive treatment strategy. Empiric high-dose fluconazole therapy decreased the mortality rate by 0.15% compared to low-dose strategy with a cost-effectiveness rate of $55,526 per DLY saved.

RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

Empirical high-dose fluconazole was an acceptable treatment strategy (using $100,000 per DLY saved as threshold) unless the physical age of an ICU survivor was 66 years or older. Empirical high-dose fluconazole was an acceptable treatment strategy using $50,000 per DLY saved with minor changes in parameters estimates.

LIMITATIONS

The estimates of our model may not be applicable to all ICU patients. Other hospitals with differences in fluconazole resistance, prevalence of invasive candidiasis, or duration of fluconazole therapy may produce different results.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that empiric high-dose fluconazole therapy should reduce the mortality associated with invasive candidiasis at an acceptable cost.

摘要

背景

高剂量氟康唑是光滑念珠菌或其他对氟康唑敏感性降低的念珠菌属引起的念珠菌血症患者的一种替代治疗方法。然而,目前不推荐经验性使用高剂量氟康唑,这可能会导致更高的药物成本和毒性。

目的

确定在疑似侵袭性念珠菌病的重症监护病房(ICU)中经验性使用高剂量氟康唑的成本效益。

设计

决策分析模型。

目标人群

疑似侵袭性念珠菌病的ICU患者。

时间范围

终身。

视角

社会视角。

干预措施

低剂量氟康唑(负荷剂量800mg,随后每日400mg)与高剂量氟康唑(负荷剂量1600mg,随后每日800mg)。分析中使用了普通氟康唑的成本。

结局指标

增加的预期寿命和每挽救一个贴现生命年(DLY)的增量成本。基线分析结果:基于当前国家氟康唑耐药水平以及正确识别念珠菌血症患者的能力,高剂量氟康唑是更有效的但更昂贵的治疗策略。与低剂量策略相比,经验性高剂量氟康唑治疗使死亡率降低了0.15%,每挽救一个DLY的成本效益率为55,526美元。

敏感性分析结果

除非ICU幸存者的实际年龄为66岁或以上,经验性高剂量氟康唑是一种可接受的治疗策略(以每挽救一个DLY100,000美元为阈值)。在参数估计有微小变化的情况下,以每挽救一个DLY50,000美元为标准,经验性高剂量氟康唑是一种可接受的治疗策略。

局限性

我们模型的估计可能不适用于所有ICU患者。氟康唑耐药性、侵袭性念珠菌病患病率或氟康唑治疗持续时间不同的其他医院可能会产生不同的结果。

结论

这些结果表明,经验性高剂量氟康唑治疗应以可接受的成本降低与侵袭性念珠菌病相关的死亡率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验