• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分配州儿童健康保险计划资金:对资金公式设计与实施的批判性审视

Distributing State Children's Health Insurance Program funds: a critical review of the design and implementation of the funding formula.

作者信息

Blewett Lynn A, Davern Michael

机构信息

University of Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 2007 Jun;32(3):415-55. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2007-010.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-2007-010
PMID:17519473
Abstract

The development of formulas to distribute federal funds to states based on demographic data continues to challenge data and policy analysts. Analysts must forward the best objective statistical analysis and data inputs to formula specifications while acknowledging the politics of the legislative process that authorizes federal funding formulas. This article evaluates the federal funding formula for the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) using key formula components of need, effort, capacity, and performance. We also examine the operationalization and measure of the target population in the SCHIP funding formula. Legislative decisions on formulas are, by nature, based on compromises that balance competing policy objectives. The analyst's role is to continually review current research standards, data quality, and relevant formula inputs and make recommendations to refine federal funding formulas to better target resources to their intended populations.

摘要

基于人口数据向各州分配联邦资金的公式制定工作,持续给数据和政策分析师带来挑战。分析师必须在承认授权联邦资金公式的立法程序存在政治因素的同时,将最佳的客观统计分析和数据输入提供给公式规范。本文运用需求、努力程度、能力和绩效等关键公式要素,对儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)的联邦资金公式进行评估。我们还研究了SCHIP资金公式中目标人群的操作化定义和衡量标准。公式方面的立法决策本质上基于平衡相互竞争的政策目标的妥协。分析师的职责是持续审视当前的研究标准、数据质量及相关公式输入,并提出改进联邦资金公式的建议,以便更好地将资源投向目标人群。

相似文献

1
Distributing State Children's Health Insurance Program funds: a critical review of the design and implementation of the funding formula.分配州儿童健康保险计划资金:对资金公式设计与实施的批判性审视
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2007 Jun;32(3):415-55. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2007-010.
2
The State Children's Health Insurance Program: successes, shortcomings, and challenges.国家儿童健康保险计划:成就、不足与挑战。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Sep-Oct;23(5):51-62. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.5.51.
3
State eligibility rules under separate state SCHIP programs--implications for children's access to health care.各州单独的儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)下的资格规定——对儿童获得医疗保健的影响。
Policy Brief George Wash Univ Cent Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Sep(4):1-22.
4
The impacts of the State Children's Health Insurance Program on children who enroll: findings from ten states.儿童健康保险计划对参保儿童的影响:来自十个州的调查结果
Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1520-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00707.x.
5
Impact of the State Children's Health Insurance Program on adolescents in New York.纽约州儿童健康保险计划对青少年的影响。
Pediatrics. 2007 Apr;119(4):e885-92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1953.
6
SCHIP at a crossroads: experiences to date and challenges ahead.儿童健康保险计划处于十字路口:迄今的经验与未来的挑战。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):356-69. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.356.
7
Assessing SCHIP effects using household survey data: promises and pitfalls.利用家庭调查数据评估儿童健康保险计划的效果:前景与问题
Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 3):112-27.
8
Reaching for it. States struggle to gain new money for children's healthcare.努力争取。各州都在努力为儿童医疗保健争取新资金。
Mod Healthc. 1998 Feb 2;28(5):44-6, 48.
9
New opportunities, new approaches: serving children with special health care needs under SCHIP.新机遇、新方法:在儿童健康保险计划下为有特殊医疗需求的儿童提供服务。
Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 3):102-11.
10
Activism in an age of restraint: the resiliency of administrative structure in implementing the State Children's Health Insurance Program.受限时代的行动主义:实施儿童健康保险计划时行政结构的韧性
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2004 Fall;27(2):210-39.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Insurance Dynamics: Methodological Considerations and a Comparison of Estimates from Two Surveys.健康保险动态:方法学考量及两项调查估计值的比较
Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct;51(5):1981-2001. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12449. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
2
The Polls-Review: Inaccurate Age and Sex Data in the Census Pums Files: Evidence and Implications.《民意调查回顾:人口普查公共使用微数据样本文件中不准确的年龄和性别数据:证据与影响》
Public Opin Q. 2010 Fall;74(3):551-569. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfq033. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
3
Counting uninsurance and means-tested coverage in the American community survey: a comparison to the current population survey.
在“美国社区调查”中计算未参保和收入资格保险覆盖情况:与当前人口调查的比较。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Feb;46(1 Pt 1):210-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01193.x. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
4
The American Community Survey and health insurance coverage estimates: possibilities and challenges for health policy researchers.美国社区调查与医疗保险覆盖范围估计:健康政策研究人员面临的可能性与挑战
Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr;44(2 Pt 1):593-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00921.x. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
5
The relationship between state capacity measures and allocations to children and youth with special needs within the MCH Services Block Grant.妇幼保健服务整笔拨款中,国家能力衡量指标与分配给有特殊需求的儿童和青少年之间的关系。
Matern Child Health J. 2009 Jul;13(4):435-44. doi: 10.1007/s10995-008-0378-5. Epub 2008 Jul 2.