Anand Curuchi, Al-Juburi Amar, Familoni Babajide, Rashed Hani, Cutts Teresa, Abidi Nighat, Johnson William D, Minocha Anil, Abell Thomas L
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Ark., USA.
Digestion. 2007;75(2-3):83-9. doi: 10.1159/000102961. Epub 2007 May 18.
Drug-refractory gastroparesis has previously been without acceptable alternative therapies. Although gastric electrical stimulation has been used for over a decade, no long-term multicenter data exist.
We studied 214 consecutive drug-refractory patients with the symptoms of gastroparesis (146 idiopathic, 45 diabetic, 23 after surgery) who consented to participate in a variety of clinical research and clinical protocols at three centers from January 1992 through January 2005, resulting in 156 patients implanted with a gastric electrical stimulation device and the other 58 patients serving as controls. The patients were stratified into three groups: (1) consented but never permanently implanted; (2) implanted with permanent device, and (3) consented while awaiting a permanent device. The patients were followed over time for gastrointestinal symptoms, solid gastric emptying, health-related quality of life, survival, device retention, and complications. Demographics, descriptive statistics, and t tests were used for comparison between baseline and latest follow-up.
At latest follow-up, median 4 years for 5,568 patient months, most patients implanted (135 of 156) were alive with intact devices, significantly reduced gastrointestinal symptoms, and improved health-related quality of life, with evidence of improved gastric emptying, and 90% of the patients had a response in at least 1 of 3 main symptoms. Most patients explanted, usually for pocket infections, were later reimplanted successfully. There were no deaths directly related to the device.
Based on this sample of patients, implanted with gastric electrical stimulation devices at three centers and followed for up toward a decade, gastric electrical stimulation for drug-refractory gastroparesis is both safe and effective.
此前,药物难治性胃轻瘫尚无可接受的替代疗法。尽管胃电刺激已应用了十多年,但尚无长期多中心数据。
我们研究了214例连续的药物难治性胃轻瘫患者(146例特发性、45例糖尿病性、23例术后),这些患者同意从1992年1月至2005年1月在三个中心参与各种临床研究和临床方案,结果156例患者植入了胃电刺激装置,另外58例患者作为对照。患者被分为三组:(1)同意但从未永久植入;(2)植入永久装置;(3)同意并等待永久装置。对患者进行长期随访,观察胃肠道症状、固体胃排空、健康相关生活质量、生存率、装置保留情况及并发症。使用人口统计学、描述性统计和t检验对基线和最新随访进行比较。
在最新随访时,中位随访时间为4年,共5568患者月,大多数植入患者(156例中的135例)存活且装置完好,胃肠道症状显著减轻,健康相关生活质量得到改善,有胃排空改善的证据,90%的患者在3项主要症状中至少有1项有反应。大多数因口袋感染而取出装置的患者后来成功重新植入。没有与装置直接相关的死亡病例。
基于在三个中心植入胃电刺激装置并随访近十年的这组患者样本,胃电刺激治疗药物难治性胃轻瘫既安全又有效。