Sievert Lynnette Leidy
Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003-9278, USA.
Menopause. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(4):742-51. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3180577841.
The literature of sweat physiology and population variation in response to heat stress suggests that variation in sweating patterns may affect the measurement of hot flashes. This study examined variation in sweating patterns in Puebla, Mexico, and Amherst, MA, and compared the levels of concordance between subjective and objective measures of hot flashes.
Thirteen women in Puebla, Mexico, and 15 women in Amherst, MA, aged 45 to 61, completed surveys, body diagrams of heat flow during a hot flash, anthropometric measures, and the measurement of hot flashes through skin conductance monitoring. Hot flashes were measured through sternal (Mexico and Massachusetts) and nuchal (Mexico only) skin conductance.
Mexican women were significantly more likely to describe the heat of hot flashes on the back of their neck (100% vs 40%) and on their arms and/or hands (85% vs 40%) compared with women in Massachusetts. Hot flashes in the midback were associated with concordance between nuchal, but not sternal, measures of skin conductance and subjective report in Mexico. In comparing average scores for concordance between subjective and sternal measures of hot flashes, there was a higher mean score for true positives in Mexico (61% vs 29%, P=0.06) and a significantly higher mean score for false-negative measures in Massachusetts (57% vs 21%, P=0.04).
Variation in rates of concordance between subjective and objective measures were not adequately explained by sweating patterns. Future studies should consider population variation in acclimatization and assess variation in the amount of sweat produced during a hot flash.
关于出汗生理学以及热应激反应中人群差异的文献表明,出汗模式的差异可能会影响潮热的测量。本研究调查了墨西哥普埃布拉和马萨诸塞州阿默斯特的出汗模式差异,并比较了潮热主观测量与客观测量之间的一致性水平。
13名年龄在45至61岁之间的墨西哥普埃布拉女性和15名马萨诸塞州阿默斯特女性完成了调查问卷、潮热期间热流的身体示意图、人体测量以及通过皮肤电导监测进行的潮热测量。通过胸骨(墨西哥和马萨诸塞州)和颈部(仅墨西哥)皮肤电导测量潮热。
与马萨诸塞州的女性相比,墨西哥女性更有可能描述颈部后方(100%对40%)以及手臂和/或手部(85%对40%)的潮热热度。在墨西哥,背部中部的潮热与颈部皮肤电导测量和主观报告之间的一致性相关,但与胸骨皮肤电导测量无关。在比较潮热主观测量与胸骨测量之间的一致性平均得分时,墨西哥真阳性的平均得分更高(61%对29%,P=0.06),而马萨诸塞州假阴性测量的平均得分显著更高(57%对21%,P=0.04)。
主观测量与客观测量之间的一致性率差异不能通过出汗模式得到充分解释。未来的研究应考虑人群在适应方面的差异,并评估潮热期间出汗量的差异。