Suppr超能文献

在累积风险评估中,脆弱性作为个体和群体资源的函数。

Vulnerability as a function of individual and group resources in cumulative risk assessment.

作者信息

DeFur Peter L, Evans Gary W, Cohen Hubal Elaine A, Kyle Amy D, Morello-Frosch Rachel A, Williams David R

机构信息

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23284, USA.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 2007 May;115(5):817-24. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9332. Epub 2007 Jan 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The field of risk assessment has focused on protecting the health of individual people or populations of wildlife from single risks, mostly from chemical exposure. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently began to address multiple risks to communities in the "Framework for Cumulative Risk Assessment" [EPA/630/P02/001F. Washington DC:Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2003)]. Simultaneously, several reports concluded that some individuals and groups are more vulnerable to environmental risks than the general population. However, vulnerability has received little specific attention in the risk assessment literature.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective is to examine the issue of vulnerability in cumulative risk assessment and present a conceptual framework rather than a comprehensive review of the literature. In this article we consider similarities between ecologic and human communities and the factors that make communities vulnerable to environmental risks.

DISCUSSION

The literature provides substantial evidence on single environmental factors and simple conditions that increase vulnerability or reduce resilience for humans and ecologic systems. This observation is especially true for individual people and populations of wildlife. Little research directly addresses the topic of vulnerability in cumulative risk situations, especially at the community level. The community level of organization has not been adequately considered as an end point in either human or ecologic risk assessment. Furthermore, current information on human risk does not completely explain the level of response in cumulative risk conditions. Ecologic risk situations are similarly more complex and unpredictable for cases of cumulative risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychosocial conditions and responses are the principal missing element for humans. We propose a model for including psychologic and social factors as an integral component of cumulative risk assessment.

摘要

背景

风险评估领域一直专注于保护个人或野生动植物种群的健康免受单一风险影响,主要是化学物质暴露风险。美国环境保护局最近在《累积风险评估框架》[EPA/630/P02/001F。华盛顿特区:风险评估论坛,美国环境保护局(2003年)]中开始探讨社区面临的多种风险。同时,几份报告得出结论,一些个人和群体比普通人群更容易受到环境风险的影响。然而,脆弱性在风险评估文献中很少受到具体关注。

目的

我们的目的是研究累积风险评估中的脆弱性问题,并提出一个概念框架,而非对文献进行全面综述。在本文中,我们考虑生态社区与人类社区之间的相似性以及使社区易受环境风险影响的因素。

讨论

文献提供了大量关于单一环境因素以及增加人类和生态系统脆弱性或降低其恢复力的简单条件的证据。这一观察结果在个人和野生动植物种群方面尤为明显。很少有研究直接探讨累积风险情况下的脆弱性主题,尤其是在社区层面。在人类或生态风险评估中,组织的社区层面尚未被充分视为一个终点。此外,当前关于人类风险的信息并不能完全解释累积风险情况下的反应程度。对于累积风险情况,生态风险状况同样更为复杂且不可预测。

结论

心理社会状况和反应是人类方面主要缺失的要素。我们提出一个将心理和社会因素纳入累积风险评估不可或缺部分的模型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验