Living with thalidomide: health status and quality of life at 40 years.

Thalidomide was first synthesized in 1953 and was subsequently marketed as a mild hypnotic and sedative in more than 20 countries. By 2001 it was estimated that there were 5,000 survivors from the 10,000 - 12,000 babies who were, as a result, born with severe abnormalities. For these survivors, recent concerns have emerged about their physical state, in particular their levels of pain and their ability to maintain independence. It was therefore wished to ascertain health status and current concerns amongst a sample of survivors living in the UK. A combination of qualitative and quantitative methodologies was employed. Qualitative interviews were undertaken with a sample drawn from the population affected by thalidomide known to the Thalidomide Trust. Selection of participants was based upon a theoretical sample frame. Postal questionnaires to examine health status and various psychosocial aspects concerned with living with the consequences of thalidomide were sent subsequently to these same participants and to a random sample of those not originally drawn for the qualitative interviews. For the qualitative interviews, 28 agreed to take part; two refused and the remainder did not respond. Those agreeing to interview were representative of the original compensation bands (Chi-Square = 3.929; p = 0.416). Several themes emerged from these interviews, including the effects on work and career; coping in terms of attitude to life, self-image, confidence, self-esteem, stress and emotion; relationships, independent living issues and emergent problems such as pain, quality of life, and anxiety about the future. A postal questionnaire was then sent to those who had agreed to interview (28), plus a random sample of the remaining group who were not initially chosen for the qualitative interviews. In total 82 people were sent the questionnaire, of whom 41 (50%) responded. Two-thirds of responders were female. Seven out of ten lived with a partner, and over half (56%) had children. Almost half (46%) were in work, but 32% reported they were permanently unable to work because of disability. Current levels of impairment were found to be similar across groups defined by the original compensation band. In contrast, the activity limitation measures showed a steep gradient across bands but only 37% considered themselves disabled. Nevertheless, despite the restriction in activities for some, levels of participation were similar across bands; likewise simple summary items on health status and quality of life were similar and 70% reported their quality of life (QoL) was good or better than good. Yet nine in ten believed that their body was less flexible than in the past. Almost as many reported they were less able to carry things. It turns out that when compensation bands were grouped (1 - 3, 4 - 5) to highlight those most severely affected according to the original assessment, then those in the higher band grouping reported significantly more musculoskeletal problems, high levels of fatigue and increasing dependency and feelings of vulnerability. It is clear that the original ranking of disability severity, as expressed through the compensation, bands (allocated in early childhood in most cases), is consistent with current ranking of limitations in activity and participation. Nevertheless, despite high levels of disability amongst some survivors, lifelong adjustments to the original impairments have resulted in more than two thirds reporting at least a good quality of life. However, survivors expressed increasing concern about emerging musculoskeletal and other problems which may compromise hard-won independence.