Peralta Victor, Cuesta Manuel J, Zandio Maria
Psychiatric Unit, Virgen del Camino Hospital, Irunlarrea 4, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2007 Jun;9(3):184-92. doi: 10.1007/s11920-007-0017-7.
The diagnosis of cycloid psychosis has a long tradition in European psychiatry. However, it has been poorly assimilated within the DSM IV and ICD-10 diagnostic systems. Leonhard set the basis for the current conceptualization of the disorder, and Perris and Brockington developed the first operational diagnostic criteria. However, the two conceptualizations of the disorder are not the same and differ across a number of meaningful variables. Cycloid psychosis is a useful concept in that it possesses both clinical and predictive validity. Despite the high prevalence of mood symptoms and syndromes, cycloid psychosis does not equal schizoaffective disorder. Although a substantial body of evidence suggests that cycloid psychosis differs meaningfully from typical schizophrenia, it is less clear whether it differs from major mood disorders or represents an independent nosological entity. The existence of putative subtypes is also likely, and the differentiation between affective and nonaffective subtypes has received some support.
环性精神病的诊断在欧洲精神病学领域有着悠久的传统。然而,它在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)和《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)诊断系统中并未得到很好的吸纳。莱昂哈德为该疾病当前的概念化奠定了基础,佩里斯和布罗金顿制定了首个操作性诊断标准。然而,该疾病的两种概念化并不相同,在一些有意义的变量上存在差异。环性精神病是一个有用的概念,因为它兼具临床有效性和预测有效性。尽管情绪症状和综合征的患病率很高,但环性精神病并不等同于分裂情感性障碍。虽然大量证据表明环性精神病与典型精神分裂症有显著差异,但它是否与重度情绪障碍不同或代表一个独立的疾病实体尚不清楚。假定亚型的存在也很可能,并且情感性亚型和非情感性亚型之间的区分已得到一些支持。