Pfuhlmann B, Jabs B, Althaus G, Schmidtke A, Bartsch A, Stöber G, Beckmann H, Franzek E
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Wuerzburg, Fuechsleinstrasse 15, D-97080 Wuerzburg, Germany.
J Affect Disord. 2004 Nov 15;83(1):11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2004.03.005.
Whereas a growing body of evidence suggests that cycloid psychoses have to be separated from schizophrenic psychoses, their relations to bipolar affective disorder are less clear. To further clarify this issue a controlled family study was undertaken.
All living and traceable adult first-degree relatives of 45 cycloid psychotic, 32 manic-depressive and 27 control probands were personally examined by an experienced psychiatrist blind to the diagnosis of the index proband. Data about not traceable relatives were collected by the "Family-History"-Method. A catamnestic diagnosis was established for each of the 431 relatives blind to family data. Age-corrected morbidity risks were calculated using the life-table method.
Relatives of cycloid psychotic patients showed a significantly lower morbidity risk for endogenous psychoses in general and manic-depressive illness compared to relatives of patients with manic-depressive illness. The familial morbidity risk for cycloid psychoses was low and did not differ significantly in both proband groups. Relatives of cycloid psychotic patients however did not differ significantly from relatives of controls regarding familial morbidity.
Our time-consuming methodical procedure implicated a relatively small number of participants due to restricted personnel resources. The restriction to hospitalised probands could possibly cause a limited representativity of the study sample.
Our results suggest that cycloid psychoses are aetiologically different from manic-depressive illness and could not be integrated into a spectrum of bipolar affective disorders. The findings provide further evidence for a nosological independence of cycloid psychoses.
越来越多的证据表明,循环性精神病必须与精神分裂症性精神病区分开来,但其与双相情感障碍的关系尚不清楚。为了进一步阐明这个问题,我们进行了一项对照家族研究。
由一位对索引先证者诊断不知情的经验丰富的精神科医生对45例循环性精神病患者、32例躁狂抑郁症患者和27例对照先证者的所有在世且可追踪的成年一级亲属进行亲自检查。通过“家族史”方法收集关于无法追踪亲属的数据。对431名对家族数据不知情的亲属分别进行了回顾性诊断。使用生命表法计算年龄校正后的发病风险。
与躁狂抑郁症患者的亲属相比,循环性精神病患者的亲属患内源性精神病(总体而言)和躁狂抑郁症的发病风险显著更低。循环性精神病的家族发病风险较低,且在两个先证者组中无显著差异。然而,循环性精神病患者的亲属在家族发病率方面与对照组亲属无显著差异。
由于人员资源有限,我们耗时的方法程序涉及的参与者数量相对较少。仅纳入住院先证者可能会导致研究样本的代表性有限。
我们的结果表明,循环性精神病在病因上与躁狂抑郁症不同,不能纳入双相情感障碍的范畴。这些发现为循环性精神病在疾病分类学上的独立性提供了进一步的证据。