Van Houdt Winan J, Wu Hongju, Glasgow Joel N, Lamfers Martine L, Dirven Clemens M, Gillespie G Yancey, Curiel David T, Haviv Yosef S
Department of Neurosurgery, VU University Medical Center, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Neuro Oncol. 2007 Jul;9(3):280-90. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2007-017. Epub 2007 May 23.
Adenoviral (Ad) vectors demonstrate several attributes of potential utility for glioma gene therapy. Although Ad infection is limited in vitro by low expression levels of the coxsackie-adenoviral receptor (CAR), in vivo studies have shown the efficacy of Ad vectors as gene delivery vectors. To evaluate the in vivo utility of CAR-independent, infectivity-enhanced Ad vectors, we employed genetically modified Ad vectors in several experimental models of human gliomas. We used three capsid-modified Ad vectors: (1) a chimeric Ad vector with a human Ad backbone and a fiber knob of a canine Ad, (2) an Ad vector with a polylysine motif incorporated into the fiber gene, and (3) a double-modified Ad vector incorporating both an RGD4C peptide and the polylysine motif. These three modified Ad vectors target, respectively, the putative membrane receptor(s) of the canine Ad vector, heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), and both integrins and HSPGs. Our in vitro studies indicated that these retargeting strategies all enhanced CAR-independent infectivity in both established and primary low-passage glioma cells. Enhancement of in vitro gene delivery by the capsid-modified vectors correlated inversely with the levels of cellular CAR expression. However, in vivo in orthotopic human glioma xenografts, the unmodified Ad vector was not inferior relative to the capsid-modified Ad vector. Although genetic strategies to circumvent CAR deficiency in glioma cells could reproducibly expand the cellular entry mechanisms of Ad vectors in cultured and primary glioma cells, these approaches were insufficient to confer in vivo significant infectivity enhancement over unmodified Ad vectors. Other factors, probably the extracellular matrix, stromal cells, and the three-dimensional tumor architecture, clearly play important roles in vivo and interfere with Ad-based gene delivery into glioma tumors.
腺病毒(Ad)载体展现出了在胶质瘤基因治疗中潜在有用的几个特性。尽管在体外,由于柯萨奇病毒 - 腺病毒受体(CAR)的低表达水平,腺病毒感染受到限制,但体内研究已表明腺病毒载体作为基因递送载体的有效性。为了评估不依赖CAR且感染性增强的腺病毒载体在体内的效用,我们在几种人类胶质瘤实验模型中使用了基因改造的腺病毒载体。我们使用了三种衣壳修饰的腺病毒载体:(1)一种具有人腺病毒骨架和犬腺病毒纤维结的嵌合腺病毒载体,(2)一种在纤维基因中掺入聚赖氨酸基序的腺病毒载体,以及(3)一种同时掺入RGD4C肽和聚赖氨酸基序的双重修饰腺病毒载体。这三种修饰的腺病毒载体分别靶向犬腺病毒载体的假定膜受体、硫酸乙酰肝素蛋白聚糖(HSPG)以及整合素和HSPG。我们的体外研究表明,这些重新靶向策略均增强了在已建立的和原代低传代胶质瘤细胞中不依赖CAR的感染性。衣壳修饰载体增强体外基因递送与细胞CAR表达水平呈负相关。然而,在原位人类胶质瘤异种移植模型中,未修饰的腺病毒载体并不比衣壳修饰的腺病毒载体差。尽管在胶质瘤细胞中规避CAR缺陷的基因策略能够在培养的和原代胶质瘤细胞中可重复地扩展腺病毒载体的细胞进入机制,但这些方法不足以在体内赋予比未修饰的腺病毒载体显著增强的感染性。其他因素,可能是细胞外基质、基质细胞和三维肿瘤结构,显然在体内发挥重要作用,并干扰基于腺病毒的基因递送至胶质瘤肿瘤。