Tsang Hector W H, Angell Beth, Corrigan Patrick W, Lee Yueh-Ting, Shi Kan, Lam Chow S, Jin Shenghua, Fung Kevin M T
Dept. of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;42(9):723-33. doi: 10.1007/s00127-007-0208-x. Epub 2007 May 23.
Employment discrimination is considered as a major impediment to community integration for people with serious mental illness, yet little is known about how the problem manifests differently across western and non-western societies. We developed a lay model based on Chinese beliefs and values in terms of Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and folk religions which may be used to explain cross-cultural variation in mental illness stigma, particularly in the arena of employment discrimination. In this study, we tested this lay approach by comparing employers' concerns about hiring people with psychotic disorder for entry-level jobs in US and China.
One hundred employers (40 from Chicago, 30 from Hong Kong, and 30 from Beijing) were randomly recruited from small size firms and interviewed by certified interviewers using a semi-structured interview guide designed for this study. Content analysis was used to derive themes, which in turn were compared across the three sites using chi-square tests.
Analyses reveal that employers express a range of concerns about hiring an employee with mental illness. Although some concerns were raised with equal frequency across sites, comparisons showed that, relative to US employers, Chinese employers were significantly more likely to perceive that people with mental illness would exhibit a weaker work ethic and less loyalty to the company. Comparison of themes also suggests that employers in China were more people-oriented while employers in US were more task-oriented.
Cultural differences existed among employers which supported the lay theory of mental illness.
就业歧视被认为是严重精神疾病患者融入社会的主要障碍,但对于这一问题在西方和非西方社会中如何表现出差异,人们了解甚少。我们基于儒家、道家、佛教和民间宗教的中国信仰与价值观,构建了一个外行模型,该模型可用于解释精神疾病污名的跨文化差异,尤其是在就业歧视领域。在本研究中,我们通过比较美国和中国雇主对招聘患有精神障碍的人从事入门级工作的担忧,来检验这种外行方法。
从小型公司中随机招募了100名雇主(40名来自芝加哥,30名来自香港,30名来自北京),并由经过认证的访谈员使用为本研究设计的半结构化访谈指南进行访谈。采用内容分析法得出主题,然后使用卡方检验在三个地点之间进行比较。
分析表明,雇主对招聘患有精神疾病的员工表达了一系列担忧。尽管在各个地点提出的一些担忧频率相同,但比较显示,相对于美国雇主,中国雇主更有可能认为患有精神疾病的人职业道德较弱,对公司的忠诚度较低。主题比较还表明,中国雇主更以人为本,而美国雇主更以任务为导向。
雇主之间存在文化差异,这支持了精神疾病的外行理论。