[A case of dwarfism with severely reduced activity of growth hormone-binding protein].

We presented a 16-year-old boy with severe growth retardation and markedly decreased levels of growth hormone-binding protein (GHBP) in plasma, which was shown to correspond to the extracellular composition of hepatic GH receptor and suggested to reflect tissue concentration of the receptor. His height was 92.5 cm (-13.5 SD), the weight 9.6kg (-5.8 SD) and Tanner stage was I. His bone age was 3.5 years old at 16 years of age. Karyotype was 46,XY and thyroid function was normal. SM-C levels, determined by Nichols RIA using unextracted plasma, were within the low normal range, 0.67/0.68U/ml. In contrast, using a method of acid-ethanol extraction, IGF-I and IGF-II levels were definitely low, 29ng/ml (normal 88-240) and 165ng/ml (374-804) respectively. GH responses in various provocation tests, including insulin, arginine and GRF, were within normal. Basal GH levels were 20 +/- 12ng/ml and urinary GH excretion rates 217 +/- 85pg/mg. Cr, which were elevated compared to age-matched control. Molecular size of his circulating GH was similar to control subjects. The biological activities of GH, evaluated by radioreceptor assay and Nb2 cell bioassay, were proportional to the immunoactivities of GH. SM bioactivities, which were determined by the stimulatory effects on DNA synthesis of rabbit costal chondrocytes and human fibroblasts, were apparently reduced. Electrophoretic patterns of IGF-binding protein was similar to those of GH deficient cases. Daily administration of hGH (4U/day) for 5 days resulted in a poor response of SM-C production (before 0.68, after 0.77U/ml). GHBP activities were definitely low by gel-filtration, immunoprecipitation and charcoal methods, as seen in Laron dwarfism which is defined as a syndrome of congenital GH receptor defects. These results indicate that the tissue content of GH receptor in this case was quantitatively reduced and as a result, he showed a resistance to endogenous and exogenous GH. It remains to be elucidated whether the GH receptor defect in our case is derived from a genetic origin or an acquired condition.