Sasano Hironobu, Suzuki Takashi, Moriya Takuya
Department of Pathology, Tohoku University School of Medicine and Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Endocr Pathol. 2006 Winter;17(4):345-54. doi: 10.1007/s12022-006-0006-0.
Discerning malignancy in resected adrenocortical neoplasms can pose diagnostic difficulty. Macroscopic examination is the first important step toward diagnosis and should include accurate measurement of weight and dimension of the specimens and description of the cut surface of the tumors. It is also important to sample the specimens for histological diagnosis near foci of hemorrhage and/or necrosis. Histological scoring systems evaluating multiple parameters, especially the criteria of Weiss, have been shown to be reliable in differential diagnosis between adrenocortical adenoma and carcinoma. A tumor is defined as adrenocortical carcinoma when three or more of the following criteria are met; (1) high nuclear grade, (2) mitotic rate six or more per 50 high power fields, (3) atypical mitosis, (4) clear cells less than 25%, (5) a diffuse architecture pattern in more than one-third of the tumor, (6) confluent necrosis, (7) venous invasion, (8) sinusoidal invasion, and (9) capsular invasion. The criteria are relatively straightforward and considered the most effective standard for diagnosis of adrenocortical malignancy. However, great care should be taken in applying the criteria to histological evaluation of two relatively rare and peculiar adrenocortical tumors, adrenocortical oncocytoma and pediatric adrenocortical neoplasms. At this juncture, ancillary biological or molecular markers are of little practical value in terms of differential diagnosis between adrenocortical adenoma and carcinoma but tumors with MIB1 or Ki-67 labeling index more than 2.5 may be considered malignant. Prognostic markers of adrenocortical carcinoma have not been established other than complete respectability of the tumor. There are also no surrogate markers for predicting response to therapy with Mitotane, an adrenolytic agent. It sometimes is important for surgical pathologists to differentiate adrenocortical carcinoma from metastatic malignancies of other sites. An immunohistochemical evaluation of adrenal 4 binding protein (Ad4BP) or SF-1, a transcription factor of all steroidogenesis, can aid in this differential diagnosis because nuclear immunoreactivity for this transcription factor is relatively specific to steroid producing cells.
判断切除的肾上腺皮质肿瘤是否为恶性可能存在诊断困难。大体检查是诊断的首要重要步骤,应包括准确测量标本的重量和尺寸以及描述肿瘤的切面情况。对标本进行取材以在出血和/或坏死灶附近进行组织学诊断也很重要。评估多个参数的组织学评分系统,尤其是魏斯标准,已被证明在肾上腺皮质腺瘤和癌的鉴别诊断中是可靠的。当满足以下三个或更多标准时,肿瘤被定义为肾上腺皮质癌:(1)高核分级;(2)每50个高倍视野有6个或更多的有丝分裂率;(3)非典型有丝分裂;(4)透明细胞少于25%;(5)肿瘤超过三分之一呈弥漫性结构模式;(6)融合性坏死;(7)静脉侵犯;(8)窦状隙侵犯;(9)包膜侵犯。这些标准相对简单直接,被认为是诊断肾上腺皮质恶性肿瘤的最有效标准。然而,在将这些标准应用于两种相对罕见且特殊的肾上腺皮质肿瘤——肾上腺皮质嗜酸性细胞瘤和儿童肾上腺皮质肿瘤的组织学评估时应格外谨慎。此时,辅助生物学或分子标志物在肾上腺皮质腺瘤和癌的鉴别诊断方面几乎没有实际价值,但MIB1或Ki-67标记指数超过2.5的肿瘤可能被视为恶性。除肿瘤完全可切除外,肾上腺皮质癌的预后标志物尚未确立。也没有预测对溶肾上腺药物米托坦治疗反应的替代标志物。对于外科病理学家来说,有时区分肾上腺皮质癌与其他部位的转移性恶性肿瘤很重要。对肾上腺4结合蛋白(Ad4BP)或SF-1(所有类固醇生成的转录因子)进行免疫组化评估有助于这种鉴别诊断,因为该转录因子的核免疫反应性相对特异于类固醇产生细胞。