Suppr超能文献

腰椎小关节神经阻滞治疗慢性下腰痛的评估:一项随机、双盲对照试验的初步报告:临床试验NCT00355914

Evaluation of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in the management of chronic low back pain: preliminary report of a randomized, double-blind controlled trial: clinical trial NCT00355914.

作者信息

Manchikanti Laxmaiah, Manchikanti Kavita N, Manchukonda Rajeev, Cash Kimberly A, Damron Kim S, Pampati Vidyasagar, McManus Carla D

机构信息

Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, KY 42003, USA.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2007 May;10(3):425-40.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of persistent low back pain with the involvement of lumbar facet or zygapophysial joints has been described in controlled studies as varying from 15% to 45% based on the criteria of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Therapeutic interventions utilized in managing chronic low back pain of facet joint origin include intraarticular injections, medial branch nerve blocks, and neurolysis of medial branch nerves.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical effectiveness of therapeutic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in managing chronic low back pain of facet joint origin.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.

SETTING

An interventional pain management setting in the United States.

METHODS

In this preliminary analysis, data from a total of 60 patients were included, with 15 patients in each of 4 groups. Thirty patients were in a non-steroid group consisting of Groups I (control, with lumbar facet joint nerve blocks using bupivacaine ) and II (with lumbar facet joint nerve blocks using bupivacaine and Sarapin); another 30 patients were in a steroid group consisting of Groups III (with lumbar facet joint nerve blocks using bupivacaine and steroids) and IV (with lumbar facet joint nerve blocks using bupivacaine, Sarapin, and steroids). All patients met the diagnostic criteria of lumbar facet joint pain by means of comparative, controlled diagnostic blocks.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scale, the Oswestry Disability Index 2.0 (ODI), employment status, and opioid intake.

RESULTS

Significant improvement in pain and functional status were observed at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, compared to baseline measurements. The average number of treatments for 1 year was 3.7 with no significant differences among the groups. Duration of average pain relief with each procedure was 14.8 +/- 7.9 weeks in the non-steroid group, and 12.5 +/- 3.3 weeks in the steroid group, with no significant differences among the groups.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks with local anesthetic, with or without Sarapin or steroids, may be effective in the treatment of chronic low back pain of facet joint origin.

摘要

背景

根据国际疼痛研究协会的标准,在对照研究中,伴有腰椎小关节或关节突关节受累的持续性下腰痛患病率为15%至45%。用于治疗小关节源性慢性下腰痛的治疗干预措施包括关节内注射、内侧支神经阻滞和内侧支神经松解术。

目的

确定治疗性腰椎小关节神经阻滞治疗小关节源性慢性下腰痛的临床疗效。

设计

一项前瞻性、随机、双盲试验。

地点

美国的一个介入性疼痛管理机构。

方法

在这项初步分析中,共纳入60例患者的数据,4组每组15例。30例患者在非类固醇组,包括第一组(对照组,使用布比卡因进行腰椎小关节神经阻滞)和第二组(使用布比卡因和沙巴因进行腰椎小关节神经阻滞);另外30例患者在类固醇组,包括第三组(使用布比卡因和类固醇进行腰椎小关节神经阻滞)和第四组(使用布比卡因、沙巴因和类固醇进行腰椎小关节神经阻滞)。所有患者均通过对比、对照诊断性阻滞符合腰椎小关节疼痛的诊断标准。

观察指标

数字评定量表(NRS)疼痛评分、奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数2.0(ODI)、就业状况和阿片类药物摄入量。

结果

与基线测量相比,在3个月、6个月和12个月时观察到疼痛和功能状态有显著改善。1年的平均治疗次数为3.7次,各组之间无显著差异。非类固醇组每次治疗的平均疼痛缓解持续时间为14.8±7.9周,类固醇组为12.5±3.3周,各组之间无显著差异。

结论

使用局部麻醉剂进行治疗性腰椎小关节神经阻滞,无论是否添加沙巴因或类固醇,可能对治疗小关节源性慢性下腰痛有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验