Albright Jeffrey B, Pidala Mark J, Cali Joseph R, Snyder Michael J, Voloyiannis Theodoros, Bailey H Randolph
University of Texas Affiliated Hospitals, 6550 Fannin Street, Suite 2307, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Jul;50(7):996-1003. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-0221-x.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in perianal abscesses represents an underrecognized condition. It is unclear whether these abscesses differ in presentation or other characteristics from their non-MRSA counterparts.
Patients diagnosed with perianal abscess, who underwent incision and drainage between January 2003 and September 2005, were identified retrospectively. Demographics, abscess characteristics (induration, erythema, abscess size, amount of purulence), presence of MRSA on culture, MRSA susceptibilities, and clinical course were collected.
A total of 104 patients (62.5 percent male; mean age, 42.7+/-13.7 years) were treated for perianal abscess. For the 69 patients cultured at drainage, MRSA was present in 34.8 percent (24/69) of cases (95 percent confidence interval, 24.6-46.6 percent). MRSA-positive patients did not significantly differ from MRSA-negative patients with respect to age, MRSA risk factors, duration of symptoms, white blood cell count at admission, or length of stay. Patients were more likely to be MRSA-positive if they possessed extensive induration (odds ratio, 6.52; P=0.003), extensive erythema (odds ratio, 5.75; P=0.003), or small amount of purulence (odds ratio, 9.72; P=0.006). Ischiorectal abscesses were significantly less likely to be MRSA-positive (odds ratio, 0.34; P=0.016). No patients with MRSA-positive abscesses developed fistulas. All MRSA isolates were resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics and had limited susceptibility to quinolones.
The prevalence of MRSA in perianal abscesses has not been described previously and is higher in our group of patients than would be expected. MRSA-positive patients cannot be identified by risk factors alone. Antibiotic resistance spectra of MRSA vary from that of enteric bacteria typically seen in perianal abscesses. Therefore, it may be beneficial to culture all perianal abscesses with extensive induration and erythema or minimal purulence.
肛周脓肿中的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是一种未被充分认识的情况。目前尚不清楚这些脓肿在表现或其他特征上是否与其非MRSA对应物有所不同。
回顾性确定2003年1月至2005年9月期间接受切开引流术的肛周脓肿患者。收集人口统计学资料、脓肿特征(硬结、红斑、脓肿大小、脓性物量)、培养时MRSA的存在情况、MRSA药敏情况及临床病程。
共有104例肛周脓肿患者接受治疗(男性占62.5%;平均年龄42.7±13.7岁)。在69例引流时进行培养的患者中,34.8%(24/69)的病例存在MRSA(95%置信区间为24.6 - 46.6%)。MRSA阳性患者在年龄、MRSA危险因素、症状持续时间、入院时白细胞计数或住院时间方面与MRSA阴性患者无显著差异。如果患者有广泛硬结(比值比为6.52;P = 0.003)、广泛红斑(比值比为5.75;P = 0.003)或少量脓性物(比值比为9.72;P = 0.006),则更有可能为MRSA阳性。坐骨直肠窝脓肿MRSA阳性的可能性显著较低(比值比为0.34;P = 0.016)。没有MRSA阳性脓肿患者发生肛瘘。所有MRSA分离株对β-内酰胺类抗生素耐药,对喹诺酮类药物敏感性有限。
肛周脓肿中MRSA的患病率此前未被描述,在我们的患者群体中高于预期。不能仅通过危险因素来识别MRSA阳性患者。MRSA的抗生素耐药谱与肛周脓肿中常见的肠道细菌不同。因此,对所有有广泛硬结、红斑或脓性物极少的肛周脓肿进行培养可能是有益的。