Ambrose Ella Grace
School of Medicine, Learning and Teaching Office, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NL, UK.
J Med Ethics. 2007 Jun;33(6):325-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.016915.
In sub-Saharan Africa, a nurse gives iron pills as placebos to terminally ill patients. She tells them, acting in what she believes is in their best interests, "these will make you feel better". The patients believe it will help their AIDS and their well-being improves. Do the motive and the patient's positive outcome in well-being make the deceit justifiable when other issues such as consent, autonomy and potential consequences regarding the patient and the wider community are considered? Is there a difference between lying and non-lying deception when the end result is the same? The patients feel better, but at what cost if the deceit was found out? It will be argued that although the actions of the nurse are understandable and to some extent defensible, they are unethical. It is not ethically acceptable to take away the patient's autonomy and risk the health of the community even though the risk of deceit being discovered is a small one.
在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,一名护士给绝症患者服用铁剂当作安慰剂。她告诉患者,她认为这样做符合患者的最大利益,“这些药会让你们感觉好些”。患者们相信这会对他们的艾滋病病情有帮助,他们的健康状况也有所改善。当考虑到诸如患者的同意权、自主权以及对患者和更广泛社区的潜在后果等其他问题时,这种出于善意的动机以及患者健康状况的积极结果能否使这种欺骗行为变得合理呢?当最终结果相同时,说谎和不说谎的欺骗行为有区别吗?患者感觉好多了,但如果欺骗行为被发现,会付出什么代价呢?有人会认为,尽管护士的行为可以理解且在一定程度上有其合理性,但它们是不道德的。剥夺患者的自主权并危及社区健康,即便被发现欺骗行为的风险很小,在伦理上也是不可接受的。