• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

砂质土壤中硝酸盐淋失的监测:三种方法的比较

Monitoring of nitrate leaching in sandy soils: comparison of three methods.

作者信息

Zotarelli Lincoln, Scholberg Johannes M, Dukes Michael D, Muñoz-Carpena Rafael

机构信息

University of Florida, IFAS, Agronomy Department, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2007 May 25;36(4):953-62. doi: 10.2134/jeq2006.0292. Print 2007 Jul-Aug.

DOI:10.2134/jeq2006.0292
PMID:17526874
Abstract

Proper N fertilizer and irrigation management can reduce nitrate leaching while maintaining crop yield, which is critical to enhance the sustainability of vegetable production on soils with poor water and nutrient-holding capacities. This study evaluated different methods to measure nitrate leaching in mulched drip-irrigated zucchini, pepper, and tomato production systems. Fertigation rates were 145 and 217 kg N ha(-1) for zucchini; 192 and 288 kg N ha(-1) for pepper; and 208 and 312 kg N ha(-1) for tomato. Irrigation was either applied at a fixed daily rate or based on threshold values of soil moisture sensors placed in production beds. Ceramic suction cup lysimeters, subsurface drainage lysimeters and soil cores were used to access the interactive effects of N rate and irrigation management on N leaching. Irrigation treatments and N rate interaction effects on N leaching were significant for all crops. Applying N rates in excess of standard recommendations increased N leaching by 64, 59, and 32%, respectively, for pepper, tomato, and zucchini crops. Independent of the irrigation treatment or nitrogen rate, N leaching values measured from the ceramic cup lysimeter-based N leaching values were lower than the values from the drainage lysimeter and soil coring methods. However, overall nitrate concentration patterns were similar for all methods when the nitrate concentration and leached volume were relatively low.

摘要

合理的氮肥和灌溉管理可以减少硝酸盐淋失,同时维持作物产量,这对于提高保水保肥能力差的土壤上蔬菜生产的可持续性至关重要。本研究评估了测量覆盖滴灌西葫芦、辣椒和番茄生产系统中硝酸盐淋失的不同方法。西葫芦的施肥量分别为145和217千克氮/公顷;辣椒为192和288千克氮/公顷;番茄为208和312千克氮/公顷。灌溉要么以固定的日灌水量进行,要么基于放置在生产床中的土壤湿度传感器的阈值进行。使用陶瓷吸盘测渗仪、地下排水测渗仪和土芯来研究施氮量和灌溉管理对氮素淋失的交互作用。灌溉处理和施氮量对所有作物的氮素淋失交互作用均显著。对于辣椒、番茄和西葫芦作物,施氮量超过标准推荐量分别使氮素淋失增加了64%、59%和32%。无论灌溉处理或氮肥用量如何,基于陶瓷杯测渗仪测得的氮素淋失值均低于排水测渗仪和土芯取样法测得的值。然而,当硝酸盐浓度和淋失量相对较低时,所有方法的总体硝酸盐浓度模式相似。

相似文献

1
Monitoring of nitrate leaching in sandy soils: comparison of three methods.砂质土壤中硝酸盐淋失的监测:三种方法的比较
J Environ Qual. 2007 May 25;36(4):953-62. doi: 10.2134/jeq2006.0292. Print 2007 Jul-Aug.
2
In situ measurements of nitrate leaching implicate poor nitrogen and irrigation management on sandy soils.硝酸盐淋溶的原位测量表明,沙质土壤上的氮素和灌溉管理不善。
J Environ Qual. 2005 Nov 7;34(6):2243-54. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0047. Print 2005 Nov-Dec.
3
Evaluation of the impact of various agricultural practices on nitrate leaching under the root zone of potato and sugar beet using the STICS soil-crop model.使用STICS土壤作物模型评估各种农业实践对马铃薯和甜菜根区硝酸盐淋失的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2008 May 15;394(2-3):207-21. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.01.021. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
4
Effects of polymer-coated urea on nitrate leaching and nitrogen uptake by potato.聚合物包膜尿素对马铃薯硝酸盐淋失和氮素吸收的影响。
J Environ Qual. 2010 Feb 19;39(2):492-9. doi: 10.2134/jeq2009.0265. Print 2010 Mar-Apr.
5
Study of nitrate leaching and nitrogen fate under intensive vegetable production pattern in northern China.中国北方集约化蔬菜生产模式下硝酸盐淋失及氮素去向研究
C R Biol. 2009 Apr;332(4):385-92. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2008.11.005. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
6
Nitrate and phosphate leaching in a Phaeozem soil treated with biosolids, composted biosolids and inorganic fertilizers.用生物固体、堆肥生物固体和无机肥料处理的黑钙土中硝酸盐和磷酸盐的淋失情况。
Waste Manag. 2009 Jun;29(6):1936-44. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.12.025. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
7
Nitrate leaching in two irrigated soils with different rates of cattle manure.两种不同牛粪施用量灌溉土壤中的硝酸盐淋失。
J Environ Qual. 2009 Oct 29;38(6):2218-28. doi: 10.2134/jeq2008.0519. Print 2009 Nov-Dec.
8
Nitrogen balance and groundwater nitrate contamination: comparison among three intensive cropping systems on the North China Plain.氮平衡与地下水硝酸盐污染:华北平原三种集约种植系统的比较
Environ Pollut. 2006 Sep;143(1):117-25. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.11.005. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
9
Nitrate-nitrogen concentrations in the perched ground water under seepage-irrigated potato cropping systems.渗灌马铃薯种植系统下 perched 地下水(此处 perched 可能有误,推测为“上层滞水”之类的意思)中的硝酸盐氮浓度
J Environ Qual. 2008 Feb 11;37(2):387-94. doi: 10.2134/jeq2006.0545. Print 2008 Mar-Apr.
10
Modeling nitrate leaching and optimizing water and nitrogen management under irrigated maize in desert oases in Northwestern China.在西北干旱区绿洲灌区,建立了玉米硝态氮淋溶模型,并优化了水氮管理。
J Environ Qual. 2010 Feb 19;39(2):667-77. doi: 10.2134/jeq2009.0204. Print 2010 Mar-Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative research on monitoring methods for nitrate nitrogen leaching in tea plantation soils.茶园土壤硝态氮淋失监测方法的比较研究
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 5;14(1):20747. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71081-3.
2
Nitrogen dynamics as a function of soil types, compaction, and moisture.氮动态变化受土壤类型、紧实度和湿度的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 4;19(4):e0301296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301296. eCollection 2024.
3
Analysis of Bacterial Microbiota of Aerated Compost Teas and Effect on Tomato Growth.好的,我将把“Analysis of Bacterial Microbiota of Aerated Compost Teas and Effect on Tomato Growth.”翻译为简体中文,以下是译文: 通气堆肥茶中细菌微生物群分析及其对番茄生长的影响。
Microb Ecol. 2023 Aug;86(2):959-972. doi: 10.1007/s00248-022-02156-9. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
4
High Level of Nitrogen Makes Tomato Plants Releasing Less Volatiles and Attracting More (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae).高氮水平使番茄植株释放的挥发性物质减少,并吸引更多(半翅目:粉虱科)。
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Mar 31;8:466. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00466. eCollection 2017.
5
Assessing crop N status of fertigated vegetable crops using plant and soil monitoring techniques.利用植物和土壤监测技术评估滴灌蔬菜作物的氮素状况
Ann Appl Biol. 2015 Nov;167(3):387-405. doi: 10.1111/aab.12235. Epub 2015 Jul 2.