Damen Godelieve W J A, Langereis Margreet C, Snik Ad F M, Chute Patricia M, Mylanus Emmanuel A M
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Otol Neurotol. 2007 Jun;28(4):463-72. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318033efee.
Investigation of the relation between classroom performance and language development of cochlear implant (CI) students in mainstream education. Structural analyses of assessment of mainstream performance (AMP) and Screening Instrument For Targeting Educational Risk (SIFTER) instruments.
Cross-sectional instrument and language development analyses.
Tertiary university medical center.
Twenty-six CI children in elementary school with congenital or prelingual deafness were included. At the time of this study, mean period of multichannel CI use was 5.3 years, and children's ages ranged from 6.5 to 12.8 years.
Assessment of mainstream performance and SIFTER instruments measured classroom performance and language development were measured by means of Reynell and Schlichting tests.
Assessment of mainstream performance and SIFTER domains showed good reliability (Cronbach alpha >0.6), but factor analyses only showed the expected instrument structure in the AMP. In both questionnaires and within all domains, individual variability is detected. Spearman's correlation analyses showed the probable explanation of individual questionnaire variability by language test results (p value mostly <0.01). The AMP and SIFTER instruments showed a predictive capacity for language development, based upon general linear model univariate and linear regression analyses.
Individual classroom performance, measured by AMP and SIFTER questionnaires, of CI children in mainstream education varies. Correlation analyses showed strong significant relation between questionnaire results (classroom performance) and both expressive and receptive language test results (Schlichting and Reynell tests). Structural questionnaire analyses of the AMP and SIFTER demonstrated good reliability. The predictive value of the AMP can monitor the actual linguistic functioning of the child.
研究主流教育环境下人工耳蜗(CI)植入学生的课堂表现与语言发展之间的关系。对主流表现评估(AMP)和教育风险筛查工具(SIFTER)进行结构分析。
横断面工具及语言发展分析。
三级大学医学中心。
纳入26名患有先天性或语前聋的小学CI儿童。在本研究开展时,多通道CI的平均使用时间为5.3年,儿童年龄在6.5至12.8岁之间。
通过Reynell和Schlichting测试对主流表现评估和SIFTER工具所测量的课堂表现及语言发展进行评估。
主流表现评估和SIFTER各领域显示出良好的信度(Cronbach α>0.6),但因子分析仅在AMP中显示出预期的工具结构。在两份问卷及所有领域中,均检测到个体差异。Spearman相关性分析表明,语言测试结果可能是个体问卷差异的原因(p值大多<0.01)。基于一般线性模型单变量分析和线性回归分析,AMP和SIFTER工具显示出对语言发展的预测能力。
主流教育环境下,通过AMP和SIFTER问卷测量的CI儿童个体课堂表现存在差异。相关性分析表明,问卷结果(课堂表现)与表达性和接受性语言测试结果(Schlichting和Reynell测试)之间存在强显著关系。对AMP和SIFTER进行的结构问卷分析显示出良好的信度。AMP的预测价值可监测儿童的实际语言功能。