Gohlke Frank, Rolf Olaf
Orthopädische Klinik, König-Ludwig-Haus, Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie, Brettreichstrasse 11, D-97074, Würzburg.
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2007 Jun;19(2):185-208. doi: 10.1007/s00064-007-1202-x.
Alleviation of pain, restoration of function and active range of motion.
Failed posttraumatic shoulder prostheses with insufficient rotator cuff, pseudoparalysis, chronic instability, severe ankylosis.
Advanced glenoid destruction. Severe lesions of the deltoid muscle (> 50%) and axillary nerve palsy. Florid infections.
Deltopectoral approach. Exposure of the failed implant and explantation by fenestration of the humerus. Periarticular release with preservation of neurovascular structures. Exposure of the glenoid, cementless fixation of the glenoid base plate (metaglène) and application of the glenoid ball (glenosphere). Fenestration of the humeral shaft, removal of bone cement, placement of wire and suture loops, and cemented implantation of the humeral component (long revision stem) in 10-30 degrees retroversion related to the long axis of the forearm. Anatomic reconstruction of the soft tissues with preservation of the external rotators (reattachment of dislocated tubercles and, if necessary, transposition of latissimus dorsi and teres major as described by L'Episcopo).
For 6 weeks postoperatively, abduction brace and passive or active-assisted exercises including continuous passive motion (Ormed, Freiburg, Germany).
From 2000 to 2005, a total of 84 shoulder replacement revisions were performed with the reverse prosthesis, of which 34 were revisions of failed fracture hemiarthroplasties (five men, 29 women) through a bone window in the humerus. 25 patients were followed prospectively for up to 59 months postoperatively; an additional nine patients were interviewed by telephone or in writing (n=34, average age 68 years [59-82 years], average follow-up 31.5 months [12-59 months]). The preoperative age- and gender-related Constant Score was 17.5% and improved to 63% postoperatively. Range of motion for active elevation and internal rotation was substantially improved (average elevation preoperatively 48 degrees , postoperatively 125 degrees ). Pain was relieved in every patient. Function correlated to the extent of soft-tissue damage. 14 patients were very satisfied with the surgical outcome, 16 were satisfied and four dissatisfied. There were eight complications in total.
减轻疼痛,恢复功能及活动范围。
创伤后肩关节假体失败,伴有肩袖不足、假性麻痹、慢性不稳定、严重关节强直。
严重的肩胛盂破坏。三角肌严重损伤(>50%)及腋神经麻痹。急性感染。
胸三角肌入路。暴露失败的植入物,通过肱骨开窗取出。保留神经血管结构进行关节周围松解。暴露肩胛盂,肩胛盂基板(metaglène)非骨水泥固定并应用肩胛盂球(glenosphere)。肱骨骨干开窗,去除骨水泥,放置钢丝和缝合环,肱骨组件(长翻修柄)以相对于前臂长轴10 - 30度的后倾角骨水泥固定植入。保留外旋肌进行软组织的解剖重建(重新附着脱位的结节,如有必要,按L'Episcopo所述进行背阔肌和大圆肌转位)。
术后6周,使用外展支具并进行被动或主动辅助锻炼,包括持续被动活动(德国弗赖堡的Ormed)。
2000年至2005年,共使用反向假体进行了84例肩关节置换翻修手术,其中34例是通过肱骨骨窗对失败的骨折半关节置换术进行翻修(5名男性,29名女性)。25例患者术后前瞻性随访长达59个月;另外9例患者通过电话或书面方式接受访谈(n = 34,平均年龄68岁[59 - 82岁],平均随访31.5个月[12 - 59个月])。术前与年龄和性别相关的Constant评分平均为17.5%,术后提高到63%。主动抬高和内旋的活动范围显著改善(术前平均抬高48度,术后125度)。每位患者的疼痛均得到缓解。功能与软组织损伤程度相关。14例患者对手术结果非常满意,16例满意,4例不满意。总共出现8例并发症。