Baxter Colden V, Fausch Kurt D, Murakami Masashi, Chapman Phillip L
Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, and Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Oecologia. 2007 Aug;153(2):461-70. doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0743-x. Epub 2007 May 26.
Movements of prey organisms across ecosystem boundaries often subsidize consumer populations in adjacent habitats. Human disturbances such as habitat degradation or non-native species invasions may alter the characteristics or fate of these prey subsidies, but few studies have measured the direct effects of this disruption on the growth and local abundance of predators in recipient habitats. Here we present evidence, obtained from a combined experimental and comparative study in northern Japan, that an invading stream fish usurped the flux of allochthonous prey to a native fish, consequently altering the diet and reducing the growth and abundance of the native species. A large-scale field experiment showed that excluding terrestrial invertebrates that fell into the stream with a mesh greenhouse reduced terrestrial prey in diets of native Dolly Varden charr (Salvelinus malma) by 46-70%, and reduced their growth by 25% over six weeks. However, when nonnative rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were introduced, they monopolized these prey and caused an even greater reduction of terrestrial prey in charr diets of 82-93%, and reduced charr growth by 31% over the same period. Adding both greenhouse and rainbow trout treatments together produced similar results to adding either alone. Results from a comparative field study of six other stream sites in the region corroborated the experimental findings, showing that at invaded sites rainbow trout usurped the terrestrial prey subsidy, causing a more than 75% decrease in the biomass of terrestrial invertebrates in Dolly Varden diets and forcing them to shift their foraging to insects on the stream bottom. Moreover, at sites with even low densities of rainbow trout, biomass of Dolly Varden was more than 75% lower than at sites without rainbow trout. Disruption of resource fluxes between habitats may be a common, but unidentified, consequence of invasions, and an additional mechanism contributing to the loss of native species.
猎物生物体跨越生态系统边界的移动通常会为相邻栖息地的消费者种群提供补充。诸如栖息地退化或外来物种入侵等人类干扰可能会改变这些猎物补贴的特征或命运,但很少有研究测量这种干扰对受纳栖息地中捕食者生长和本地丰度的直接影响。在此,我们展示了从日本北部一项结合实验和比较研究中获得的证据,即一种入侵的溪流鱼类夺取了外来猎物向本地鱼类的通量,从而改变了本地物种的饮食,降低了其生长速度和丰度。一项大规模的野外实验表明,用网状温室排除落入溪流的陆生无脊椎动物,可使本地多莉·瓦登鲑(Salvelinus malma)饮食中的陆生猎物减少46% - 70%,并在六周内使其生长速度降低25%。然而,当引入非本地虹鳟(Oncorhynchus mykiss)时,它们独占了这些猎物,导致多莉·瓦登鲑饮食中的陆生猎物减少幅度更大,达到82% - 93%,并在同一时期使多莉·瓦登鲑生长速度降低31%。将温室处理和虹鳟处理同时进行产生的结果与单独进行任何一种处理相似。对该地区其他六个溪流地点的比较野外研究结果证实了实验结果,表明在入侵地点,虹鳟夺取了陆生猎物补贴,导致多莉·瓦登鲑饮食中陆生无脊椎动物的生物量减少超过75%,并迫使它们将觅食转向溪流底部的昆虫。此外,在虹鳟密度较低的地点,多莉·瓦登鲑的生物量比没有虹鳟的地点低75%以上。栖息地之间资源通量的中断可能是入侵的一个常见但未被认识到的后果,也是导致本地物种丧失的另一个机制。