Kilduff Liam P, Lewis Sarah, Kingsley Mike I C, Owen Nick J, Dietzig Rebecca E
Department of Sport Science, Vivian Tower, University of Wales Swansea, Swansea, UK.
J Strength Cond Res. 2007 May;21(2):378-84. doi: 10.1519/R-19245.1.
The purpose of the present study was twofold: firstly, to assess the reliability of various body composition methods, and secondly, to determine the ability of the methods to estimate changes in fat-free mass (FFM) following creatine (Cr) supplementation. Fifty-five healthy male athletes (weight 78.3 +/- 10.3 kg, age 21 +/- 1 years) gave informed consent to participate in this study. Subjects' FFM was estimated by hydrostatic weighing (HW), air-displacement plethysmography (ADP), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR), and anthropometric measurements (ANTHRO). Measurements were taken on 2 occasions separated by 7 days to assess the reliability of the methods. Following this, 30 subjects returned to the laboratory for an additional test day following 7 days of Cr supplementation (20 g.d(-1) Cr + 140 g.d(-1) dextrose) to assess each method's ability to detect acute changes in FFM. In terms of reliability, we found excellent test-retest correlations for all 5 methods, ranging from 0.983 to 0.998 (p < 0.001). The mean biases for the 5 methods were close to 0 (range -0.1 to 0.3 kg) and their 95% limits of agreement (LOAs) were within acceptable limits (HW = -1.1 to 1.7 kg; ADP = -1.1 to 1.2 kg; BIA = -1.0 to 1.0 kg; NIR = -1.4 to 1.4 kg); however, the 95% LOAs were slightly wider for ANTHRO (-2.4 to 2.6 kg). Following Cr supplementation there was a significant increase in body mass (from 77.9 +/- 10.1 kg to 78.9 +/- 10.3 kg, p = 0.000). In addition, all 5 body composition techniques detected the change in FFM to a similar degree (mean change: HW = 0.9 +/- 0.6 kg; ADP = 0.9 +/- 0.6 kg; BIA = 0.9 +/- 0.6 kg; NIR = 0.8 +/- 0.5 kg; ANTHRO = 1.0 +/- 0.7 kg; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.962). We conclude that between-day differences in FFM estimation were within acceptable limits, with the possible exception of ANTHRO. In addition, all 5 methods provided similar measures of FFM change during acute Cr supplementation.
第一,评估各种身体成分测量方法的可靠性;第二,确定这些方法在补充肌酸(Cr)后估计去脂体重(FFM)变化的能力。55名健康男性运动员(体重78.3±10.3kg,年龄21±1岁)签署知情同意书参与本研究。通过水下称重(HW)、空气置换体积描记法(ADP)、生物电阻抗分析(BIA)、近红外光谱法(NIR)和人体测量学(ANTHRO)来估计受试者的FFM。在相隔7天的两个时间点进行测量,以评估这些方法的可靠性。在此之后,30名受试者在补充7天Cr(20g·d⁻¹Cr + 140g·d⁻¹葡萄糖)后返回实验室进行额外的测试日,以评估每种方法检测FFM急性变化的能力。在可靠性方面,我们发现所有5种方法的重测相关性都非常好,范围从0.983到0.998(p < 0.001)。这5种方法的平均偏差接近0(范围为 -0.1至0.3kg),其95%一致性界限(LOA)在可接受范围内(HW = -1.1至1.7kg;ADP = -1.1至1.2kg;BIA = -1.0至1.0kg;NIR = -1.4至1.4kg);然而,ANTHRO的95%LOA略宽(-2.4至2.6kg)。补充Cr后体重显著增加(从77.9±10.1kg增至78.9±10.3kg,p = 0.000)。此外,所有5种身体成分测量技术检测FFM变化的程度相似(平均变化:HW = 0.9±0.6kg;ADP = 0.9±0.6kg;BIA = 0.9±0.6kg;NIR = 0.8±0.5kg;ANTHRO = 1.0±0.7kg;组内相关系数 = 0.962)。我们得出结论,FFM估计的日间差异在可接受范围内,ANTHRO可能除外。此外,在急性补充Cr期间,所有5种方法提供的FFM变化测量结果相似。