Suppr超能文献

溃疡性结肠炎的治疗成本——使用吸附柱进行治疗性血液成分单采是否具有成本效益?

Treatment cost of ulcerative colitis is apheresis with Adacolumn cost-effective?

作者信息

Panés J, Guilera M, Ginard D, Hinojosa J, González-Carro P, González-Lara V, Varea V, Domènech E, Badia X

机构信息

Gastroenterology Service, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Dig Liver Dis. 2007 Jul;39(7):617-25. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2007.03.007. Epub 2007 May 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Scarce data are available in Europe on the cost of treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC).

AIM

To assess the cost of illness of moderate-to-severe UC in two scenarios: traditional treatment versus alternative treatment incorporating granulocyte, monocyte adsorption - apheresis (GMA-Apheresis; Adacolumn). To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of both options in steroid-dependent patients.

METHODS

One-year cost-of-illness and cost-effectiveness analysis from the third-payer perspective using a decision tree model was carried out. Probabilities of each event were derived from the literature and an expert panel. Direct medical costs were obtained from official sources (euro2004). Effectiveness was measured by the proportion of patients achieving clinical remission.

RESULTS

The average annual cost per patient treated with traditional treatment was estimated to be euro6740; with GMA-Apheresis, the cost was estimated to be euro6959. In steroid-dependent patients, the average annual cost was euro6059 and euro11,436, respectively. The proportion of patients achieving clinical remission with GMA-Apheresis was 22.5% higher. As second- and third-line therapy, a new course of corticosteroids and surgery was avoided in 18.5 and 4% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating GMA-Apheresis (Adacolumn) in the therapeutic management of moderate-to-severe UC patients is cost-effective and implies savings related to the reduction of adverse effects derived from corticosteroid use and to the decreased number of surgical interventions.

摘要

背景

在欧洲,关于溃疡性结肠炎(UC)治疗费用的数据稀缺。

目的

评估在两种情况下中重度UC的疾病成本:传统治疗与采用粒细胞、单核细胞吸附 - 血液分离术(GMA - 血液分离术;吸附柱)的替代治疗。确定这两种选择在依赖类固醇患者中的相对成本效益。

方法

从第三方支付者的角度,使用决策树模型进行了为期一年的疾病成本和成本效益分析。每个事件的概率来自文献和专家小组。直接医疗成本从官方来源获取(2004欧元)。疗效通过实现临床缓解的患者比例来衡量。

结果

接受传统治疗的患者平均每年费用估计为6740欧元;采用GMA - 血液分离术,费用估计为6959欧元。在依赖类固醇的患者中,平均每年费用分别为6059欧元和11436欧元。采用GMA - 血液分离术实现临床缓解的患者比例高出22.5%。作为二线和三线治疗,分别有18.5%和4%的患者避免了新一轮的皮质类固醇治疗和手术。

结论

在中重度UC患者的治疗管理中采用GMA - 血液分离术(吸附柱)具有成本效益,意味着在减少皮质类固醇使用产生的不良反应和减少手术干预次数方面节省了费用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验