Peng Si-min, Zhao Wei, Lin Jia-cheng, Ling Jun-qi
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Guanghua College of Stomatolog, Sun Yet-sen University, Guangzhou 510055, Guangdong Province, China.
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2006 Dec;15(6):571-4.
To determine the role of pit and fissure sealant used in combination with self-etching adhesive in retention of the sealants and caries decrease of the permanent teeth.
Sixty two children aged 6-14 years old were chosen from the outpatients in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, the first or the second permanent molars (n= 156) were sealed with two kinds of sealant. The tooth in one side was sealed with sealant (Concise, 3M-ESPE) and self-etching system (Adper and Prompt, 3M-ESPE) while the tooth in the other side was sealed with sealant (Concise, 3M-ESPE) and phosphate acid system. All the patients were followed up and reexamined 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software package for Chi-square test and t test.
The operating time using self-etching system was (122 +/- 13)s, shorter than (219 +/- 13)s using phosphate acid system (P < 0.05). The self-etching system used only one step to finish etching, adhesion and treatment of tooth surface, saving the steps of rinsing and drying. The retention rates of pit and fissure sealant in self-etching system and phosphate acid system were 97.4% and 96.2% respectively at the third month, 94.9% and 92.3% at the sixth month, 91.0% and 88.4% at the end of one year after treatment. The prevalence rate of caries in both groups had no significant difference (P>0.05); No caries in both groups were found in the first three months; In patients using self-etching system, caries decreased by 100% at the sixth month and by 50% at the end of one year.
Adper Prompt self-etching adhesive, with an advantage of simple operation and shorter operation period, is effective in bonding sealant to the enamel. The retention rates of pit and fissure sealant were not different between the two groups.
确定窝沟封闭剂联合自酸蚀黏结剂在窝沟封闭剂保留及恒牙龋病减少方面的作用。
从儿童牙科门诊选取62例6 - 14岁儿童,其第一或第二恒磨牙(n = 156)用两种封闭剂进行封闭。一侧牙齿用封闭剂(Concise,3M - ESPE)和自酸蚀系统(Adper和Prompt,3M - ESPE)封闭,另一侧牙齿用封闭剂(Concise,3M - ESPE)和磷酸酸蚀系统封闭。所有患者在治疗后3、6和12个月进行随访及复查。使用SPSS 12.0(SPSS公司,美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥)软件包进行卡方检验和t检验的统计分析。
使用自酸蚀系统的操作时间为(122 ± 13)秒,短于使用磷酸酸蚀系统的(219 ± 13)秒(P < 0.05)。自酸蚀系统仅需一步即可完成牙齿表面的酸蚀、黏结和处理,省去了冲洗和干燥步骤。治疗后第三个月,自酸蚀系统和磷酸酸蚀系统中窝沟封闭剂的保留率分别为97.4%和96.2%,第六个月分别为94.9%和92.3%,一年后分别为91.0%和88.4%。两组龋病患病率无显著差异(P > 0.05);前三个月两组均未发现龋病;使用自酸蚀系统的患者,第六个月龋病减少100%,一年后减少50%。
Adper Prompt自酸蚀黏结剂操作简单、操作时间短,在将封闭剂黏结至牙釉质方面效果良好。两组窝沟封闭剂的保留率无差异。