• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前房内注射利多卡因在白内障手术中真的有效吗?

Is intracameral lidocaine really effective in cataract surgery?

作者信息

Välimäki J O

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Central Hospital of Lahti, Lahti, Finland and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007 May-Jun;17(3):332-5. doi: 10.1177/112067210701700309.

DOI:10.1177/112067210701700309
PMID:17534812
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the usefulness of intracameral lidocaine in cataract surgery under topical anesthesia and especially if the patient wanted intravenous sedation preoperatively.

METHODS

In this prospective study 96 patients were randomly assigned to receive 0.5 cc of balanced salt solution (Group 1) or 1% unpreserved lidocaine (Group 2). Patients who wanted sedation received intravenous midazolam hydrochloride. All surgery was done by one surgeon using a clear corneal technique.

RESULTS

Mean pain scores were 0.73 (of a maximum 3) in Group 1 and 0.54 in Group 2; the difference between groups was not statistically significant. Forty patients in Group 1 (83%) and 44 patients in Group 2 (92%) reported no discomfort or only mild discomfort. The two study groups were comparable in need for intravenous midazolam. Logistic regression analysis showed a significant relationship between pain scores and intravenous sedation (p=0.02) but not with intracameral lidocaine or other tested variables. However, odds ratio for pain increased to 5.1 (95% CI; 1.29-20.41) in participants without intravenous sedation compared to those with sedation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study suggest that intravenous sedation preoperatively seems to be an important determinant to relieve the sensation of discomfort/pain during small incision cataract surgery, but intracameral lidocaine was shown not to have a clinically useful role.

摘要

目的

评估前房内注射利多卡因在表面麻醉下白内障手术中的效用,特别是在患者术前需要静脉镇静的情况下。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,96例患者被随机分配接受0.5毫升平衡盐溶液(第1组)或1%无防腐剂的利多卡因(第2组)。需要镇静的患者接受静脉注射盐酸咪达唑仑。所有手术均由一名外科医生采用透明角膜技术完成。

结果

第1组平均疼痛评分为0.73(满分3分),第2组为0.54;两组之间的差异无统计学意义。第1组40例患者(83%)和第2组44例患者(92%)报告无不适或仅有轻微不适。两个研究组在静脉注射咪达唑仑的需求方面具有可比性。逻辑回归分析显示疼痛评分与静脉镇静之间存在显著关系(p = 0.02),但与前房内注射利多卡因或其他测试变量无关。然而,与接受镇静的参与者相比,未接受静脉镇静的参与者疼痛的优势比增加到5.1(95%置信区间;1.29 - 20.41)。

结论

本研究结果表明,术前静脉镇静似乎是减轻小切口白内障手术中不适/疼痛感觉的重要决定因素,但前房内注射利多卡因未显示出具有临床有用作用。

相似文献

1
Is intracameral lidocaine really effective in cataract surgery?前房内注射利多卡因在白内障手术中真的有效吗?
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007 May-Jun;17(3):332-5. doi: 10.1177/112067210701700309.
2
A randomized clinical trial of combined topical-intracameral anesthesia in cataract surgery.白内障手术中局部-前房内联合麻醉的随机临床试验。
Ophthalmology. 1998 Nov;105(11):2007-11. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91116-2.
3
Topical tetracaine versus topical tetracaine plus intracameral lidocaine for cataract surgery.用于白内障手术的表面丁卡因与表面丁卡因联合前房内利多卡因的比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Dec;24(12):1602-8. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80350-7.
4
Comparison of preservative-free bupivacaine vs. lidocaine for intracameral anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial and in vitro analysis.无防腐剂布比卡因与利多卡因用于前房内麻醉的比较:一项随机临床试验及体外分析
Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 Apr;127(4):393-402. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00417-6.
5
Assessing patient satisfaction with cataract surgery under topical anesthesia supplemented by intracameral lidocaine combined with sedation.评估表面麻醉联合前房内利多卡因及镇静下白内障手术患者的满意度。
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2013 Nov-Dec;76(6):345-9. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492013000600005.
6
A comparison of patient comfort during cataract surgery with topical anesthesia versus topical anesthesia and intracameral lidocaine.表面麻醉与表面麻醉联合前房内注射利多卡因用于白内障手术时患者舒适度的比较。
Ophthalmology. 1999 Jan;106(1):60-6. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90007-6.
7
Efficacy of supplementary intracameral lidocaine in routine phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia.前房内补充利多卡因在表面麻醉下常规超声乳化白内障吸除术中的疗效
Ophthalmology. 1999 Nov;106(11):2173-7. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90501-8.
8
No-anesthesia clear corneal phacoemulsification versus topical and topical plus intracameral anesthesia. Randomized clinical trial.非麻醉性透明角膜超声乳化术与表面麻醉及表面麻醉联合前房内麻醉的比较。随机临床试验。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Oct;27(10):1643-50. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00793-3.
9
[Intracameral lidocaine and phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia. Apropos of 80 operations].表面麻醉下前房内注射利多卡因与超声乳化白内障吸除术。关于80例手术
J Fr Ophtalmol. 1998 Apr;21(4):257-63.
10
Efficacy of topical plus intracameral anesthesia for cataract surgery in high myopia: randomized controlled trial.表面麻醉联合前房内麻醉用于高度近视白内障手术的疗效:随机对照试验
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Oct;34(10):1664-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.019.