Ittyerah Miriam, Marks Lawrence E
Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Br J Psychol. 2007 Nov;98(Pt 4):589-610. doi: 10.1348/000712606X171531.
The present study examined the role of vision and haptics in memory for stimulus objects that vary along the dimension of curvature. Experiment 1 measured haptic-haptic (T-T) and haptic-visual (T-V) discrimination of curvature in a short-term memory paradigm, using 30-second retention intervals containing five different interpolated tasks. Results showed poorest performance when the interpolated tasks required spatial processing or movement, thereby suggesting that haptic information about shape is encoded in a spatial-motor representation. Experiment 2 compared visual-visual (V-V) and visual-haptic (V-T) short-term memory, again using 30-second delay intervals. The results of the ANOVA failed to show a significant effect of intervening activity. Intra-modal visual performance and cross-modal performance were similar. Comparing the four modality conditions (inter-modal V-T, T-V; intra-modal V-V, T-T, by combining the data of Experiments 1 and 2), in a global analysis, showed a reliable interaction between intervening activity and experiment (modality). Although there appears to be a general tendency for spatial and movement activities to exert the most deleterious effects overall, the patterns are not identical when the initial stimulus is encoded haptically (Experiment 1) and visually (Experiment 2).
本研究考察了视觉和触觉在对沿曲率维度变化的刺激物体的记忆中的作用。实验1在短期记忆范式中测量了曲率的触觉-触觉(T-T)和触觉-视觉(T-V)辨别,使用包含五个不同插入任务的30秒保持间隔。结果表明,当插入任务需要空间处理或运动时,表现最差,从而表明关于形状的触觉信息是以空间运动表征的形式编码的。实验2比较了视觉-视觉(V-V)和视觉-触觉(V-T)短期记忆,同样使用30秒的延迟间隔。方差分析的结果未能显示干预活动的显著影响。模式内视觉表现和跨模式表现相似。通过合并实验1和实验2的数据,在全局分析中比较四种模式条件(跨模式V-T、T-V;模式内V-V、T-T),结果显示干预活动与实验(模式)之间存在可靠的交互作用。尽管总体上空间和运动活动似乎有产生最有害影响的普遍趋势,但当初始刺激通过触觉(实验1)和视觉(实验2)进行编码时,模式并不相同。