• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症患者院内转运期间的意外事件。

Unexpected events during the intrahospital transport of critically ill patients.

作者信息

Papson Jonathan P N, Russell Kassandra L, Taylor David McD

机构信息

Emergency Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;14(6):574-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.02.034.

DOI:10.1197/j.aem.2007.02.034
PMID:17535981
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine unexpected events (UEs) that occur during the intrahospital transport of critically ill emergency department patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of consecutive intrahospital transports between March 2003 and June 2004. The escorting emergency physician completed the data collection document either during or immediately after the transport. This document detailed equipment-related UEs, patient instability and invasive line-related UEs, whether the UEs required intervention, and whether the UEs were potentially life threatening (serious UEs).

RESULTS

Of 339 transports observed, 230 (67.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 62.6% to 72.7%) were associated with 604 UEs. Overall, there was a median of 1.0 UE per transport (range, 0-16). There were 277 (45.9%; 95% CI = 41.8% to 49.9%) UEs related to equipment, 158 (26.2%; 95% CI = 22.7% to 29.9%) related to patient instability, 156 (25.8%; 95% CI = 22.4% to 29.6%) related to equipment lines, and 13 (2.2%, 95% CI = 1.2% to 3.8%) miscellaneous UEs. The most common UEs were oxygen saturation probe failures, lead and line tangles, hypotension, and the wearing off of sedation and/or paralysis. Most UEs (478 [79.1%]; 95% CI = 75.6% to 82.3%) required an intervention. Emergency physicians had a significantly lower UE rate than residents. Thirty serious UEs occurred; 5.0% (95% CI = 3.4% to 7.1%) of UEs and 8.9% (95% CI = 6.2% to 12.5%) of transports were associated with a serious UE. The most common were severe hypotension, decreasing consciousness requiring intubation, and increased intracranial pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Unexpected events during the intrahospital transport of critically ill patients from the emergency department are common and can be potentially life threatening. Transporting physician experience is associated with UE rate. Strict adherence to and review of existing transport guidelines is recommended.

摘要

目的

研究急诊重症患者院内转运期间发生的意外事件(UEs)。

方法

这是一项对2003年3月至2004年6月期间连续进行的院内转运的前瞻性观察研究。护送的急诊医生在转运期间或转运后立即填写数据收集文件。该文件详细记录了与设备相关的UEs、患者不稳定情况和与侵入性管路相关的UEs,这些UEs是否需要干预,以及是否具有潜在生命威胁(严重UEs)。

结果

在观察的339次转运中,230次(67.9%;95%置信区间[CI]=62.6%至72.7%)与604次UEs相关。总体而言,每次转运的UEs中位数为1.0次(范围为0 - 16次)。有277次(45.9%;95% CI = 41.8%至49.9%)UEs与设备相关,158次(26.2%;95% CI = 22.7%至29.9%)与患者不稳定相关,156次(25.8%;95% CI = 22.4%至29.6%)与设备管路相关,13次(2.2%,95% CI = 1.2%至3.8%)为其他UEs。最常见的UEs是血氧饱和度探头故障、导联和管路缠绕、低血压以及镇静和/或麻痹作用消失。大多数UEs(47�次[79.1%];95% CI = 75.6%至82.3%)需要干预。急诊医生的UEs发生率显著低于住院医师。发生了30次严重UEs;5.Ⰰ%(95% CI = 3.4%至7.1%)的UEs和8.9%(95% CI = 6.2%至12.5%)的转运与严重UEs相关。最常见的是严重低血压、意识下降需要插管以及颅内压升高。

结论

急诊重症患者院内转运期间的意外事件很常见,且可能具有潜在生命威胁。转运医生的经验与UEs发生率相关。建议严格遵守并审查现有的转运指南。

相似文献

1
Unexpected events during the intrahospital transport of critically ill patients.重症患者院内转运期间的意外事件。
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;14(6):574-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.02.034.
2
Intrahospital transport of critically ill pediatric patients.危重症儿科患者的院内转运
Crit Care Med. 1995 Sep;23(9):1588-95. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199509000-00020.
3
A before- and after-intervention trial for reducing unexpected events during the intrahospital transport of emergency patients.一项降低急诊患者院内转运过程中意外事件发生率的干预前后试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;30(8):1433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.10.027. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
4
Unexpected events occurring during the intra-hospital transport of critically ill ICU patients.重症监护病房(ICU)危重症患者院内转运期间发生的意外事件。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014 Jun;18(6):354-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.133880.
5
Risk events during intrahospital transport of patients from the emergency department: a prospective observational study.急诊患者院内转运期间的风险事件:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Oct;38(10):776-779. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2021-211409. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
6
Adverse events during intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.重症患者院内转运期间的不良事件:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Feb;52:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.11.021. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
7
Factors that contribute to complications during intrahospital transport of the critically ill.导致重症患者院内转运期间出现并发症的因素。
J Neurosci Nurs. 1999 Apr;31(2):80-6. doi: 10.1097/01376517-199904000-00004.
8
Improving quality and safety during intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: A critical incident study.改善危重症患者院内转运期间的质量和安全:一项关键事件研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2020 Jan;33(1):12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2018.12.003. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
9
Intrahospital transport of critically ill patients.重症患者的院内转运
Crit Care. 1999;3(5):R83-9. doi: 10.1186/cc362. Epub 1999 Sep 24.
10
Assessment of an Unplanned Extubation Bundle to Reduce Unplanned Extubations in Critically Ill Neonates, Infants, and Children.评估一项未计划拔管套餐,以减少危重新生儿、婴儿和儿童的未计划拔管。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Jun 1;174(6):e200268. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0268.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons learnt from moving an intensive care unit into a new hospital.将重症监护病房迁至新医院的经验教训。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 Aug 31:17511437251330745. doi: 10.1177/17511437251330745.
2
Critically ill patients undergoing interhospital transportation: a prospective multicentre cohort study in the Euregio Meuse-Rhine.重症患者的院际转运:默兹-莱茵欧洲地区的一项前瞻性多中心队列研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 5;15(6):e099235. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099235.
3
Position Statement of ISCCM on Intrahospital Transport of Critically Ill Patients.
国际危重症护理医学学会关于危重症患者院内转运的立场声明
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2025 Apr;29(4):291-300. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24939.
4
Assessing Equitable Adherence to the Age-Friendly Health System's 4Ms Framework in an Academic Inpatient Setting.评估学术住院环境中对老年友善健康照护系统 4Ms 框架的公平性遵循情况。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241285598. doi: 10.1177/00469580241285598.
5
Adverse Events during Intrahospital Transport of Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study (I-TOUCH Study).危重症患者院内转运期间的不良事件:一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究(I-TOUCH研究)。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023 Sep;27(9):635-641. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24530.
6
Intrahospital Transport of Critically Ill Patients: Safety First.重症患者的院内转运:安全第一。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023 Sep;27(9):613-615. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24538.
7
Brain imaging with portable low-field MRI.便携式低场磁共振成像脑成像
Nat Rev Bioeng. 2023 Sep;1(9):617-630. doi: 10.1038/s44222-023-00086-w. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
8
MRI and the Critical Care Patient: Clinical, Operational, and Financial Challenges.磁共振成像与重症监护患者:临床、操作及财务挑战
Crit Care Res Pract. 2023 Jun 6;2023:2772181. doi: 10.1155/2023/2772181. eCollection 2023.
9
[Application of transport ventilator in the inter-hospital transport of critically ill children].[转运呼吸机在危重症儿童院际转运中的应用]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Mar 15;25(3):284-288. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2211116.
10
Implementation of portable head CT imaging in patients with severe acute brain injury in a French ICU: a prospective before-after design pilot study.在法国 ICU 中对严重急性脑损伤患者实施便携式头部 CT 成像:一项前瞻性前后设计的试点研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 2;12(1):20846. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25263-6.