Bock Carl E, Jones Zach F, Bock Jane H
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0334, USA.
Ecology. 2007 May;88(5):1322-7. doi: 10.1890/06-0654.
Species richness and evenness are components of biological diversity that may or may not be correlated with one another and with patterns of species abundance. We compared these attributes among flowering plants, grasshoppers, butterflies, lizards, summer birds, winter birds, and rodents across 48 plots in the grasslands and mesquite-oak savannas of southeastern Arizona. Species richness and evenness were uncorrelated or weakly negatively correlated for each taxonomic group, supporting the conclusion that richness alone is an incomplete measure of diversity. In each case, richness was positively correlated with one or more measures of abundance. By contrast, evenness usually was negatively correlated with the abundance variables, reflecting the fact that plots with high evenness generally were those where all species present were about equally uncommon. Therefore richness, but not evenness, usually was a positive predictor of places of conservation value, if these are defined as places where species of interest are especially abundant. Species diversity was more positively correlated with evenness than with richness among grasshoppers and flowering plants, in contrast to the other taxonomic groups, and the positive correlations between richness and abundance were comparatively weak for grasshoppers and plants as well. Both of these differences can be attributed to the fact that assemblages of plants and grasshoppers were numerically dominated by small subsets of common species (grasses and certain spur-throated grasshoppers) whose abundances differed greatly among plots in ways unrelated to species richness of the groups as a whole.
物种丰富度和均匀度是生物多样性的组成部分,它们彼此之间以及与物种丰度模式可能相关,也可能不相关。我们在亚利桑那州东南部草原和牧豆树 - 橡树稀树草原的48个样地中,比较了开花植物、蚱蜢、蝴蝶、蜥蜴、夏季鸟类、冬季鸟类和啮齿动物的这些属性。每个分类组的物种丰富度和均匀度不相关或呈弱负相关,这支持了仅用丰富度来衡量多样性是不完整的这一结论。在每种情况下,丰富度都与一种或多种丰度指标呈正相关。相比之下,均匀度通常与丰度变量呈负相关,这反映出均匀度高的样地通常是所有现存物种都同样不常见的样地。因此,如果将具有保护价值的地方定义为目标物种特别丰富的地方,那么通常丰富度而非均匀度是这类地方的一个积极预测指标。与其他分类组相比,蚱蜢和开花植物的物种多样性与均匀度的正相关性比与丰富度的正相关性更强,而且蚱蜢和植物的丰富度与丰度之间的正相关性也相对较弱。这两个差异都可归因于这样一个事实,即植物和蚱蜢的组合在数量上由常见物种的小子集(草类和某些尖喉蚱蜢)主导,这些常见物种在不同样地中的丰度差异很大,且与整个类群的物种丰富度无关。