Bioversity International, Parc Scientifique d' Agropolis II, 34397 Montpellier, France.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Sep 20;119(38):e2203385119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2203385119. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
Managing agricultural landscapes to support biodiversity conservation requires profound structural changes worldwide. Often, discussions are centered on management at the field level. However, a wide and growing body of evidence calls for zooming out and targeting agricultural policies, research, and interventions at the landscape level to halt and reverse the decline in biodiversity, increase biodiversity-mediated ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes, and improve the resilience and adaptability of these ecosystems. We conducted the most comprehensive assessment to date on landscape complexity effects on nondomesticated terrestrial biodiversity through a meta-analysis of 1,134 effect sizes from 157 peer-reviewed articles. Increasing landscape complexity through changes in composition, configuration, or heterogeneity significatively and positively affects biodiversity. More complex landscapes host more biodiversity (richness, abundance, and evenness) with potential benefits to sustainable agricultural production and conservation, and effects are likely underestimated. The few articles that assessed the combined contribution of linear (e.g., hedgerows) and areal (e.g., woodlots) elements resulted in a near-doubling of the effect sizes (i.e., biodiversity level) compared to the dominant number of studies measuring these elements separately. Similarly, positive effects on biodiversity are stronger in articles monitoring biodiversity for at least 2 y compared to the dominant 1-y monitoring efforts. Besides, positive and stronger effects exist when monitoring occurs in nonoverlapping landscapes, highlighting the need for long-term and robustly designed monitoring efforts. Living in harmony with nature will require shifting paradigms toward valuing and promoting multifunctional agriculture at the farm and landscape levels with a research agenda that untangles complex agricultural landscapes' contributions to people and nature under current and future conditions.
管理农业景观以支持生物多样性保护需要在全球范围内进行深刻的结构性变革。通常,讨论的重点是田间管理。然而,越来越多的证据表明,需要将农业政策、研究和干预措施的重点扩大到景观层面,以阻止和扭转生物多样性的下降,增加农业景观中生物多样性介导的生态系统服务,并提高这些生态系统的弹性和适应性。我们通过对 157 篇同行评议文章中的 1134 个效应大小进行荟萃分析,对景观复杂性对非驯化陆地生物多样性的影响进行了迄今为止最全面的评估。通过改变组成、配置或异质性来增加景观复杂性,可以显著和积极地影响生物多样性。更复杂的景观拥有更多的生物多样性(丰富度、丰度和均匀度),这对可持续农业生产和保护具有潜在的好处,而且这些影响可能被低估了。少数评估线性(如树篱)和面积(如林带)元素综合贡献的文章,与仅测量这些元素的主导数量的研究相比,其效应大小(即生物多样性水平)几乎增加了一倍。同样,与主导的 1 年监测相比,对生物多样性进行至少 2 年监测的文章对生物多样性的积极影响更强。此外,在非重叠景观中进行监测时,存在积极且更强的影响,这突出了需要进行长期和稳健设计的监测工作。与自然和谐相处将需要转变范式,在农场和景观层面上重视和促进多功能农业,制定研究议程,厘清在当前和未来条件下,复杂的农业景观对人类和自然的贡献。