• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在模拟人工搬运任务期间,与腹部凹陷和伸展相关的躯干肌肉激活及腰骨盆位置的变化。

Changes in trunk muscle activation and lumbar-pelvic position associated with abdominal hollowing and reach during a simulated manual material handling task.

作者信息

Butler Heather L, Hubley-Kozey Cheryl L, Kozey John W

机构信息

Department of Industrial Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2007 Mar;50(3):410-25. doi: 10.1080/00140130601128081.

DOI:10.1080/00140130601128081
PMID:17536777
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of abdominal hollowing (AH) on trunk muscle activation and lumbar-pelvic motion during a controlled lift and replace task. Surface electromyograms were recorded from five abdominal and two back muscle sites. Sagittal lumbar-pelvic motion was recorded by video. Subjects lifted a 3.8 kg load in normal, maximum and extreme reaches, first while performing their preferred lifting style (PLS) and then maintaining an AH technique. The external oblique muscle site activities were significantly higher (p < 0.05) for the AH technique (ranging from 7-20% of maximal voluntary activation (MVIC)) than at any of the abdominal sites for the PLS (ranging from 2-10% MVIC). Differences were found among abdominal sites for the AH, but not for the PLS. The back muscle site activities (ranging from 9-30% MVIC) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than for any of the abdominal muscles for all conditions, except for the anterior external oblique for AH. The pelvic and lumbar angles changed significantly (p < 0.05) between normal and maximal reaches and between techniques. The AH technique altered abdominal muscle activation amplitudes, with minimal differences in trunk extensors compared to the PLS. The AH resulted in more posterior pelvic tilt.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查在控制的提起和放回任务中,收腹(AH)对躯干肌肉激活和腰骶部运动的影响。从五个腹部肌肉部位和两个背部肌肉部位记录表面肌电图。通过视频记录腰骶部矢状面运动。受试者在正常、最大和极限伸展范围内提起3.8千克的重物,首先采用他们偏好的提起方式(PLS),然后保持收腹技术。对于收腹技术,腹外斜肌部位的活动显著更高(p<0.05)(范围为最大自主收缩(MVIC)的7%-20%),高于PLS时任何腹部部位的活动(范围为MVIC的2%-10%)。在收腹时各腹部部位之间存在差异,但在PLS时不存在差异。除了收腹时的腹外斜肌前部,在所有情况下,背部肌肉部位的活动(范围为MVIC的9%-30%)显著高于任何腹部肌肉(p<0.05)。在正常和最大伸展范围之间以及不同技术之间,骨盆和腰椎角度发生了显著变化(p<0.05)。收腹技术改变了腹部肌肉的激活幅度,与PLS相比,躯干伸肌的差异最小。收腹导致骨盆后倾增加。

相似文献

1
Changes in trunk muscle activation and lumbar-pelvic position associated with abdominal hollowing and reach during a simulated manual material handling task.在模拟人工搬运任务期间,与腹部凹陷和伸展相关的躯干肌肉激活及腰骨盆位置的变化。
Ergonomics. 2007 Mar;50(3):410-25. doi: 10.1080/00140130601128081.
2
Electromyographic assessment of trunk muscle activation amplitudes during a simulated lifting task using pattern recognition techniques.采用模式识别技术评估模拟举重任务中躯干肌肉激活幅度的肌电图评估。
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Dec;19(6):e505-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.09.010. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
3
Muscle activation in therapeutic exercises to improve trunk stability.旨在改善躯干稳定性的治疗性运动中的肌肉激活。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Oct;81(10):1370-9. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.16349.
4
Specific phase related patterns of trunk muscle activation during lateral lifting and lowering.侧向举升和放下过程中躯干肌肉激活的特定阶段相关模式。
Acta Physiol Scand. 2003 May;178(1):41-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-201X.2003.01115.x.
5
The effect of on-body lift assistive device on the lumbar 3D dynamic moments and EMG during asymmetric freestyle lifting.身体上的助力提升装置对非对称自由式提升过程中腰部三维动态力矩和肌电图的影响。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2008 Mar;23(3):372-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.10.012.
6
Postural and trunk muscle response to sudden release during stoop lifting tasks before and after fatigue of the trunk erector muscles.在竖脊肌疲劳前后的弯腰提举任务中,姿势和躯干肌肉对突然释放的反应。
Ergonomics. 2004 May 15;47(6):607-24. doi: 10.1080/0014013031000151659.
7
Comparison of spine motion and trunk muscle activity between abdominal hollowing and abdominal bracing maneuvers during prone hip extension.俯卧位髋关节伸展时腹部凹陷与腹部支撑动作之间脊柱运动和躯干肌肉活动的比较。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014 Jul;18(3):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
8
Pelvic floor muscle contraction and abdominal hollowing during walking can selectively activate local trunk stabilizing muscles.行走过程中盆底肌收缩和腹部凹陷可选择性激活局部躯干稳定肌。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016 Nov 21;29(4):731-739. doi: 10.3233/BMR-160678.
9
Effect of instruction, surface stability, and load intensity on trunk muscle activity.指导、表面稳定性和负荷强度对躯干肌肉活动的影响。
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Dec;19(6):e500-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.10.006. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
10
Effects of lumbar stabilization using a pressure biofeedback unit on muscle activity and lateral pelvic tilt during hip abduction in sidelying.使用压力生物反馈装置进行腰椎稳定训练对侧卧位髋关节外展时肌肉活动及骨盆侧倾的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Nov;87(11):1454-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.08.327.

引用本文的文献

1
Cocontraction of ankle dorsiflexors and transversus abdominis function in patients with low back pain.背屈肌和腹横肌的协同收缩在腰痛患者中发挥作用。
J Athl Train. 2012 Jul-Aug;47(4):379-89. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.4.12.
2
Activation amplitude patterns do not change for back muscles but are altered for abdominal muscles between dominant and non-dominant hands during one-handed lifts.在单手举重过程中,背部肌肉的激活幅度模式没有变化,但优势手和非优势手之间腹部肌肉的激活幅度模式发生了改变。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 May;106(1):95-104. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-0994-9. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
3
The feasibility of measuring the activation of the trunk muscles in healthy older adults during trunk stability exercises.
测量健康老年人在躯干稳定性训练期间躯干肌肉激活情况的可行性。
BMC Geriatr. 2008 Dec 4;8:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-8-33.