Butler Heather L, Hubley-Kozey Cheryl L, Kozey John W
Department of Industrial Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Ergonomics. 2007 Mar;50(3):410-25. doi: 10.1080/00140130601128081.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of abdominal hollowing (AH) on trunk muscle activation and lumbar-pelvic motion during a controlled lift and replace task. Surface electromyograms were recorded from five abdominal and two back muscle sites. Sagittal lumbar-pelvic motion was recorded by video. Subjects lifted a 3.8 kg load in normal, maximum and extreme reaches, first while performing their preferred lifting style (PLS) and then maintaining an AH technique. The external oblique muscle site activities were significantly higher (p < 0.05) for the AH technique (ranging from 7-20% of maximal voluntary activation (MVIC)) than at any of the abdominal sites for the PLS (ranging from 2-10% MVIC). Differences were found among abdominal sites for the AH, but not for the PLS. The back muscle site activities (ranging from 9-30% MVIC) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than for any of the abdominal muscles for all conditions, except for the anterior external oblique for AH. The pelvic and lumbar angles changed significantly (p < 0.05) between normal and maximal reaches and between techniques. The AH technique altered abdominal muscle activation amplitudes, with minimal differences in trunk extensors compared to the PLS. The AH resulted in more posterior pelvic tilt.
本研究的目的是调查在控制的提起和放回任务中,收腹(AH)对躯干肌肉激活和腰骶部运动的影响。从五个腹部肌肉部位和两个背部肌肉部位记录表面肌电图。通过视频记录腰骶部矢状面运动。受试者在正常、最大和极限伸展范围内提起3.8千克的重物,首先采用他们偏好的提起方式(PLS),然后保持收腹技术。对于收腹技术,腹外斜肌部位的活动显著更高(p<0.05)(范围为最大自主收缩(MVIC)的7%-20%),高于PLS时任何腹部部位的活动(范围为MVIC的2%-10%)。在收腹时各腹部部位之间存在差异,但在PLS时不存在差异。除了收腹时的腹外斜肌前部,在所有情况下,背部肌肉部位的活动(范围为MVIC的9%-30%)显著高于任何腹部肌肉(p<0.05)。在正常和最大伸展范围之间以及不同技术之间,骨盆和腰椎角度发生了显著变化(p<0.05)。收腹技术改变了腹部肌肉的激活幅度,与PLS相比,躯干伸肌的差异最小。收腹导致骨盆后倾增加。