Meiser Bettina, Mitchell Philip B, Kasparian Nadine A, Strong Kim, Simpson Judy M, Mireskandari Shab, Tabassum Laila, Schofield Peter R
Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Hospital, NSW, Australia.
Psychol Med. 2007 Nov;37(11):1601-11. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707000852. Epub 2007 May 31.
For families with multiple cases of bipolar disorder this study explored: attitudes towards childbearing; causal attributions for bipolar disorder, in particular the degree to which a genetic model is endorsed and its impact on the perceived stigma of bipolar disorder; and predictors of psychological distress.
Two hundred individuals (95 unaffected and 105 affected with either bipolar disorder, schizo-affective disorder - manic type, or recurrent major disorder) were surveyed, using mailed, self-administered questionnaires.
Thirty-five (35%) participants reported being 'not at all willing to have children' or 'less willing to have children' as a result of having a strong family history of bipolar disorder. Being not at all or less willing to have children was associated with perceived stigma of bipolar disorder [odds ratio (OR) 2.42, p = 0.002], endorsement of a genetic model (OR 1.76, p = 0.046), and being affected (OR 2.16, p = 0.01). Among unaffected participants only, endorsement of a genetic model was strongly correlated with perceived stigma (rs = 0.30, p = 0.004). Perceiving the family environment as an important factor in causing bipolar disorder was significantly associated with psychological distress (OR 1.58, p = 0.043) among unaffected participants. Among affected participants, perceived stigma was significantly correlated with psychological distress (OR 2.44, p = 0.02), controlling for severity of symptoms (p < 0.001).
Having a genetic explanation for bipolar disorder may exacerbate associative stigma among unaffected members from families with multiple cases of bipolar disorder, while it does not impact on perceived stigma among affected family members. Affected family members may benefit from interventions to ameliorate the adverse effects of perceived stigma.
对于有多例双相情感障碍患者的家庭,本研究探讨了:生育态度;双相情感障碍的因果归因,特别是对遗传模型的认可程度及其对双相情感障碍耻辱感认知的影响;以及心理困扰的预测因素。
采用邮寄的自填式问卷对200名个体(95名未患病者和105名患有双相情感障碍、精神分裂症-躁狂型或复发性重性障碍者)进行了调查。
35名(35%)参与者报告称,由于双相情感障碍家族病史强烈,他们“完全不愿意要孩子”或“不太愿意要孩子”。完全不愿意或不太愿意要孩子与双相情感障碍的耻辱感认知相关[优势比(OR)2.42,p = 0.002]、对遗传模型的认可(OR 1.76,p = 0.046)以及患病(OR 2.16,p = 0.01)。仅在未患病参与者中,对遗传模型的认可与耻辱感认知密切相关(rs = 0.30,p = 0.004)。未患病参与者中,将家庭环境视为导致双相情感障碍的重要因素与心理困扰显著相关(OR 1.58,p = 0.043)。在患病参与者中,控制症状严重程度后(p < 0.001),耻辱感认知与心理困扰显著相关(OR 2.44,p = 0.02)。
对双相情感障碍有遗传解释可能会加剧多例双相情感障碍家庭中未患病成员的相关耻辱感,而对患病家庭成员的耻辱感认知没有影响。患病家庭成员可能会从改善耻辱感认知不良影响的干预措施中受益。