Krämer G, Biraben A, Carreno M, Guekht A, de Haan G J, Jedrzejczak J, Josephs D, van Rijckevorsel K, Zaccara G
Swiss Epilepsy Center, Bleulerstrasse 60, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland.
Epilepsy Behav. 2007 Aug;11(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.03.014. Epub 2007 May 29.
Generic substitution is encouraged as a cost containment strategy for the management of health care resources. However, in epilepsy, the consequences of loss of symptom control are important, and antiepileptic drugs have narrow therapeutic indices. For this reason, generic substitution may be problematic, and certain health authorities have excluded antiepileptic drugs from overall policy recommendations on generic prescribing. The absence of bioequivalence data among generic forms and the relatively broad criteria for bioequivalence with the branded drug allow differences in drug exposure to arise that may be clinically relevant and necessitate monitoring of plasma levels when switching formulations to avoid loss of seizure control or emergence of side effects. Management of these issues carries a significant cost, which should be weighed carefully against the cost savings acquired when purchasing the drug. Both physicians and patients have a right to be informed and approve before pharmacists make a generic substitution or switch between generics.
作为一种控制医疗资源管理成本的策略,鼓励使用通用名药物替代。然而,在癫痫治疗中,失去症状控制的后果很严重,而且抗癫痫药物的治疗指数较窄。因此,通用名药物替代可能存在问题,某些卫生当局已将抗癫痫药物排除在通用名处方的总体政策建议之外。通用名药物剂型之间缺乏生物等效性数据,以及与品牌药物生物等效性的相对宽泛标准,可能导致药物暴露量出现差异,这在临床上可能具有相关性,并且在更换剂型时需要监测血浆水平,以避免癫痫发作控制丧失或出现副作用。处理这些问题会产生巨大成本,应仔细权衡与购买药物时节省的成本。在药剂师进行通用名药物替代或在不同通用名药物之间转换之前,医生和患者都有权获得告知并表示同意。