Anderson K E, Brickman A M, Flynn J, Scarmeas N, Van Heertum R, Sackeim H, Marder K S, Bell K, Moeller J R, Stern Y
Cognitive Neuroscience Division, Taub Institute for Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Neurology. 2007 Jul 3;69(1):32-41. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000266561.47619.23. Epub 2007 May 30.
To characterize deficits in nonverbal recognition memory and functional brain changes associated with these deficits in Alzheimer disease (AD).
Using O-15 PET, we studied 11 patients with AD and 17 cognitively intact elders during the combined encoding and retrieval periods of a nonverbal recognition task. Both task conditions involved recognition of line drawings of abstract shapes. In both conditions, subjects were first presented a list of shapes as study items, and then a list as test items, containing items from the study list and foils. In the titrated demand condition, the shape study list size (SLS) was adjusted prior to imaging so that each subject performed at approximately 75% recognition accuracy; difficulty during PET scanning in this condition was approximately matched across subjects. A control task was used in which SLS = 1 shape.
During performance of the titrated demand condition, SLS averaged 4.55 (+/-1.86) shapes for patients with AD and 7.53 (+/-4.81) for healthy elderly subjects (p = 0.031). However, both groups of subjects were closely matched on performance in the titrated demand condition during PET scanning with 72.17% (+/-7.98%) correct for patients with AD and 72.25% (+/-7.03%) for elders (p = 0.979). PET results demonstrated that patients with AD showed greater mean differences between the titrated demand condition and control in areas including the left fusiform and inferior frontal regions (Brodmann areas 19 and 45).
Relative fusiform and inferior frontal differences may reflect the Alzheimer disease (AD) patients' compensatory engagement of alternate brain regions. The strategy used by patients with AD is likely to be a general mechanism of compensation, rather than task-specific.
描述阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者非言语识别记忆缺陷以及与这些缺陷相关的功能性脑区变化。
使用O-15正电子发射断层扫描(PET),我们在一项非言语识别任务的编码和检索合并阶段研究了11例AD患者和17名认知功能正常的老年人。两种任务条件均涉及对抽象形状线条图的识别。在两种条件下,首先向受试者呈现一组形状作为学习项目,然后呈现一组作为测试项目,其中包含来自学习列表的项目和干扰项。在滴定需求条件下,在成像前调整形状学习列表大小(SLS),以使每个受试者的识别准确率约为75%;在此条件下PET扫描期间的难度在受试者之间大致匹配。使用一个对照任务,其中SLS = 1个形状。
在滴定需求条件下执行任务时,AD患者的SLS平均为4.55(±1.86)个形状,健康老年受试者为7.53(±4.81)个形状(p = 0.031)。然而,两组受试者在PET扫描期间的滴定需求条件下的表现密切匹配,AD患者的正确识别率为72.17%(±7.98%),老年人为72.25%(±7.03%)(p = 0.979)。PET结果表明,AD患者在包括左侧梭状回和额下回区域(布罗德曼区19和45)的脑区中,滴定需求条件与对照之间的平均差异更大。
相对梭状回和额下回差异可能反映了阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者对其他脑区的代偿性参与。AD患者使用的策略可能是一种普遍的代偿机制,而非特定于任务的机制。