Hudes Gary, Carducci Michael, Tomczak Piotr, Dutcher Janice, Figlin Robert, Kapoor Anil, Staroslawska Elzbieta, Sosman Jeffrey, McDermott David, Bodrogi István, Kovacevic Zoran, Lesovoy Vladimir, Schmidt-Wolf Ingo G H, Barbarash Olga, Gokmen Erhan, O'Toole Timothy, Lustgarten Stephanie, Moore Laurence, Motzer Robert J
Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2007 May 31;356(22):2271-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066838.
Interferon alfa is widely used for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma but has limited efficacy and tolerability. Temsirolimus, a specific inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin kinase, may benefit patients with this disease.
In this multicenter, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 626 patients with previously untreated, poor-prognosis metastatic renal-cell carcinoma to receive 25 mg of intravenous temsirolimus weekly, 3 million U of interferon alfa (with an increase to 18 million U) subcutaneously three times weekly, or combination therapy with 15 mg of temsirolimus weekly plus 6 million U of interferon alfa three times weekly. The primary end point was overall survival in comparisons of the temsirolimus group and the combination-therapy group with the interferon group.
Patients who received temsirolimus alone had longer overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.92; P=0.008) and progression-free survival (P<0.001) than did patients who received interferon alone. Overall survival in the combination-therapy group did not differ significantly from that in the interferon group (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.20; P=0.70). Median overall survival times in the interferon group, the temsirolimus group, and the combination-therapy group were 7.3, 10.9, and 8.4 months, respectively. Rash, peripheral edema, hyperglycemia, and hyperlipidemia were more common in the temsirolimus group, whereas asthenia was more common in the interferon group. There were fewer patients with serious adverse events in the temsirolimus group than in the interferon group (P=0.02).
As compared with interferon alfa, temsirolimus improved overall survival among patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma and a poor prognosis. The addition of temsirolimus to interferon did not improve survival. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00065468 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
干扰素α广泛用于转移性肾细胞癌,但疗效和耐受性有限。替西罗莫司是一种雷帕霉素激酶哺乳动物靶点的特异性抑制剂,可能使患有这种疾病的患者受益。
在这项多中心3期试验中,我们将626例先前未接受过治疗、预后较差的转移性肾细胞癌患者随机分组,分别接受每周静脉注射25mg替西罗莫司、每周皮下注射300万单位干扰素α(随后增至1800万单位),或每周15mg替西罗莫司加每周3次600万单位干扰素α的联合治疗。主要终点是替西罗莫司组和联合治疗组与干扰素组比较的总生存期。
单独接受替西罗莫司治疗的患者总生存期(死亡风险比为0.73;95%置信区间[CI]为0.58至0.92;P = 0.008)和无进展生存期(P < 0.001)均长于单独接受干扰素治疗的患者。联合治疗组的总生存期与干扰素组无显著差异(风险比为0.96;95%CI为0.76至1.20;P = 0.70)。干扰素组、替西罗莫司组和联合治疗组的中位总生存期分别为7.3个月、10.9个月和8.4个月。皮疹、外周水肿、高血糖和高脂血症在替西罗莫司组更常见,而乏力在干扰素组更常见。替西罗莫司组发生严重不良事件的患者少于干扰素组(P = 0.02)。
与干扰素α相比,替西罗莫司改善了转移性肾细胞癌且预后较差患者的总生存期。在干扰素中添加替西罗莫司并未改善生存期。(临床试验.gov编号,NCT00065468 [ClinicalTrials.gov]。)