Suppr超能文献

休克中的一氧化氮

Nitric oxide in shock.

作者信息

Cauwels A

机构信息

Department for Molecular Biomedical Research, VIB, Technologiepark 927, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Kidney Int. 2007 Sep;72(5):557-65. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002340. Epub 2007 May 30.

Abstract

Refractory hypotension with end-organ hypoperfusion and failure is an ominous feature of shock. Distributive shock is caused by severe infections (septic shock) or severe systemic allergic reactions (anaphylactic shock). In 1986, it was concluded that nitric oxide (NO) is the endothelium-derived relaxing factor that had been discovered 6 years earlier. Since then, NO has been shown to be important for the physiological and pathological control of vascular tone. Nevertheless, although inhibition of NO synthesis restores blood pressure, NO synthase (NOS) inhibition cannot improve outcome, on the contrary. This implies that NO acts as a double-edged sword during septic shock. Consequently, the focus has shifted towards selective inducible NOS (iNOS) inhibitors. The contribution of NO to anaphylactic shock seems to be more straightforward, as NOS inhibition abrogates shock in conscious mice. Surprisingly, however, this shock-inducing NO is not produced by the inducible iNOS, but by the so-called constitutive enzyme endothelial NOS. This review summarizes the contribution of NO to septic and anaphylactic shock. Although NOS inhibition may be promising for the treatment of anaphylactic shock, the failure of a phase III trial indicates that other approaches are required for the successful treatment of septic shock. Amongst these, high hopes are set for selective iNOS inhibitors. But it might also be necessary to shift gears and focus on downstream cardiovascular targets of NO or on other vasodilating phenomena.

摘要

伴有终末器官灌注不足和功能衰竭的难治性低血压是休克的一个不祥特征。分布性休克由严重感染(脓毒性休克)或严重的全身性过敏反应(过敏性休克)引起。1986年得出结论,一氧化氮(NO)是6年前发现的内皮源性舒张因子。从那时起,NO已被证明对血管张力的生理和病理控制很重要。然而,尽管抑制NO合成可恢复血压,但相反,抑制一氧化氮合酶(NOS)并不能改善预后。这意味着在脓毒性休克期间,NO起着双刃剑的作用。因此,关注点已转向选择性诱导型NOS(iNOS)抑制剂。NO对过敏性休克的作用似乎更为直接,因为抑制NOS可消除清醒小鼠的休克。然而,令人惊讶的是,这种诱导休克的NO不是由诱导型iNOS产生的,而是由所谓的组成型酶内皮NOS产生的。本综述总结了NO对脓毒性休克和过敏性休克的作用。尽管抑制NOS可能有望用于治疗过敏性休克,但一项III期试验的失败表明,成功治疗脓毒性休克需要其他方法。其中,人们对选择性iNOS抑制剂寄予厚望。但也可能有必要改变策略,关注NO的下游心血管靶点或其他血管舒张现象。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验