• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于活菌生物气溶胶计数的便携式撞击器性能分析。

Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols.

作者信息

Yao Maosheng, Mainelis Gediminas

机构信息

Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901-8551, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007 Jul;4(7):514-24. doi: 10.1080/15459620701407388.

DOI:10.1080/15459620701407388
PMID:17538812
Abstract

Portable impactors are increasingly being used to estimate concentration of bioaerosols in residential and occupational environments; however, little data are available about their performance. This study investigated the overall performances of the SMA MicroPortable, BioCulture, Microflow, Microbiological Air Sampler (MAS-100), Millipore Air Tester, SAS Super 180, and RCS High Flow portable microbial samplers when collecting bacteria and fungi both indoors and outdoors. The performance of these samplers was compared with that of the BioStage impactor. The Button Aerosol Sampler equipped with gelatin filter was also included in the study. Results showed that the sampling environment can have a statistically significant effect on sampler performance, most likely due to the differences in airborne microorganism composition and/or their size distribution. Data analysis using analysis of variance showed that the relative performance of all samplers (except the RCS High Flow and MAS-100) was statistically different (lower) compared with the BioStage. The MAS-100 also had statistically higher performance compared with other portable samplers except the RCS High Flow. The Millipore Air Tester and the SMA had the lowest performances. The relative performance of the impactors was described using a multiple linear regression model (R(2) = 0.83); the effects of the samplers' cutoff sizes and jet-to-plate distances as predictor variables were statistically significant. The data presented in this study will help field professionals in selecting bioaerosol samplers. The developed empirical formula describing the overall performance of bioaerosol impactors can assist in sampler design.

摘要

便携式撞击式采样器越来越多地用于估计住宅和职业环境中的生物气溶胶浓度;然而,关于其性能的数据却很少。本研究调查了SMA微型便携式、生物培养、微流、微生物空气采样器(MAS-100)、密理博空气测试仪、SAS Super 180和RCS高流量便携式微生物采样器在室内和室外采集细菌和真菌时的整体性能。将这些采样器的性能与BioStage撞击式采样器的性能进行了比较。配备明胶滤膜的纽扣式气溶胶采样器也纳入了本研究。结果表明,采样环境对采样器性能可能有统计学上的显著影响,很可能是由于空气中微生物组成和/或其大小分布的差异。使用方差分析进行的数据分析表明,与BioStage相比,所有采样器(RCS高流量采样器和MAS-100除外)的相对性能在统计学上有差异(较低)。与除RCS高流量采样器外的其他便携式采样器相比,MAS-100在统计学上也具有更高的性能。密理博空气测试仪和SMA的性能最低。使用多元线性回归模型(R(2)=0.83)描述了撞击式采样器的相对性能;采样器的截留尺寸和喷嘴到平板距离作为预测变量的影响在统计学上具有显著性。本研究提供的数据将有助于现场专业人员选择生物气溶胶采样器。所建立的描述生物气溶胶撞击式采样器整体性能的经验公式可辅助采样器设计。

相似文献

1
Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols.用于活菌生物气溶胶计数的便携式撞击器性能分析。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007 Jul;4(7):514-24. doi: 10.1080/15459620701407388.
2
Use of portable microbial samplers for estimating inhalation exposure to viable biological agents.使用便携式微生物采样器评估吸入活生物制剂的暴露情况。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;17(1):31-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500517. Epub 2006 Aug 16.
3
Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.个人可吸入气溶胶采样器在面对气溶胶源时于极缓慢流动空气中的性能。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2004 Jun;48(4):351-68. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meh006. Epub 2004 Mar 2.
4
Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.在实验室和野外环境中对高容量便携式生物气溶胶采样器的评估。
Indoor Air. 2004 Dec;14(6):385-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00257.x.
5
Sampling of high amounts of bioaerosols using a high-volume electrostatic field sampler.使用大容量静电场采样器采集大量生物气溶胶。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2008 Apr;52(3):167-76. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/men004. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
6
Field testing of a personal size-selective bioaerosol sampler.个人尺寸选择性生物气溶胶采样器的现场测试。
Ann Occup Hyg. 1999 Aug;43(6):393-404.
7
Integration of high volume portable aerosol-to-hydrosol sampling and qPCR in monitoring bioaerosols.在生物气溶胶监测中集成大容量便携式气溶胶到水溶胶采样与定量聚合酶链反应。
J Environ Monit. 2011 Mar;13(3):706-12. doi: 10.1039/c0em00559b. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
8
A small change in the design of a slit bioaerosol impactor significantly improves its collection characteristics.狭缝式生物气溶胶撞击器设计上的一个小改动显著改善了其收集特性。
J Environ Monit. 2007 Aug;9(8):855-61. doi: 10.1039/b702743e. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
9
Molecular comparison of the sampling efficiency of four types of airborne bacterial samplers.四种空气细菌采样器采样效率的分子比较。
Sci Total Environ. 2011 Nov 15;409(24):5493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.09.010. Epub 2011 Oct 2.
10
Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.生物气溶胶采样器的选择应考虑采样器的效率和覆盖微生物多样性的能力。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Nov 15;84(23). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01589-18. Print 2018 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
AirDNA sampler: An efficient and simple device enabling high-yield, high-quality airborne environment DNA for metagenomic applications.AirDNA 采样器:一种高效简单的设备,可用于宏基因组应用,获得高产量、高质量的空气环境 DNA。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 29;18(6):e0287567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287567. eCollection 2023.
2
Bioaerosol Sampling: Classical Approaches, Advances, and Perspectives.生物气溶胶采样:经典方法、进展与展望
Aerosol Sci Technol. 2020;54(5):496-519. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2019.1671950. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
3
Fungi in the indoor air of critical hospital areas: a review.
重症医院区域室内空气中的真菌:综述
Aerobiologia (Bologna). 2021;37(3):379-394. doi: 10.1007/s10453-021-09706-7. Epub 2021 May 14.
4
Recent Advances in Occupational Exposure Assessment of Aerosols.气溶胶职业暴露评估的最新进展。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 18;17(18):6820. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186820.
5
Aerosol-Transmitted Infections-a New Consideration for Public Health and Infection Control Teams.气溶胶传播感染——公共卫生与感染控制团队的新考量
Curr Treat Options Infect Dis. 2015;7(3):176-201. doi: 10.1007/s40506-015-0057-1. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
6
Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.生物气溶胶采样器的选择应考虑采样器的效率和覆盖微生物多样性的能力。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Nov 15;84(23). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01589-18. Print 2018 Dec 1.
7
Investigation of Removal Capacities of Biofilters for Airborne Viable Micro-Organisms.生物过滤器对空气传播活菌去除能力的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 19;15(3):551. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030551.
8
Comparison of the Results of Studies of Air Pollution Fungi Using the SAS Super 100, MAS 100, and Air IDEAL.使用SAS Super 100、MAS 100和Air IDEAL对空气污染真菌研究结果的比较
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jul 20;14(7):815. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070815.
9
Investigating the airborne transmission pathway - different approaches with the same objectives.探究空气传播途径——目标相同的不同方法。
Indoor Air. 2015 Apr;25(2):119-24. doi: 10.1111/ina.12175.
10
Detection of airborne psychrotrophic bacteria and fungi in food storage refrigerators.检测食品储存冰箱中的气载嗜冷细菌和真菌。
Braz J Microbiol. 2012 Oct;43(4):1436-43. doi: 10.1590/S1517-838220120004000027. Epub 2012 Jun 1.