Suppr超能文献

静脉注射和口服吗替麦考酚酯后肝移植患者体内霉酚酸的药代动力学

Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in liver transplant patients after intravenous and oral administration of mycophenolate mofetil.

作者信息

Jain Ashok, Venkataramanan Raman, Kwong Tai, Mohanka Ravi, Orloff Mark, Abt Peter, Kashyap Randeep, Tsoulfas Georgios, Mack Cindy, Williamson Mary, Batzold Pam, Bozorgzadeh Adel

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2007 Jun;13(6):791-6. doi: 10.1002/lt.21146.

Abstract

The bioavailability of mycophenolic acid (MPA) after oral administration of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been reported to be more than 90% in healthy volunteers, and in kidney and thoracic organ transplant patients. Such information is limited in liver transplant (LTx) patients. The present study compares the pharmacokinetics of MPA after intravenous (IV) and oral administrations of MMF in LTx recipients. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using WinNonlin software. A total of 12 deceased donor LTx patients initially received IV MMF and were switched to oral MMF after 2-7 days (mean, 3.3 +/- 1.7) when oral feeds were started. Multiple blood samples were drawn immediately prior to and after IV or oral MMF and the plasma concentration of MPA was measured. The mean peak plasma concentrations and the area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve (AUC) were significantly higher after IV MMF compared to oral MMF (peak plasma concentrations of 10.7 +/- 2.1 microg/mL for IV vs. 4.5 +/- 2.8 microg/mL for oral; P = 0.0001; and AUC of 28.9 +/- 7.1 microg . hr/mL for IV vs. 12.8 +/- 4.2 microg . hr/mL for oral; P = 0.0001). The oral bioavailability of MPA was 48.5 +/- 18.7%. The systemic clearance, half-life, and steady state volume of distribution of MPA were 26.9 +/- 6 L/hour, 5.5 hours, and 85 liters, respectively. The terminal disposition half-life was not significantly different between the 2 routes of administration. In conclusion, during the early postoperative period, LTx recipients have MPA exposure with oral MMF of less than half that of IV MMF. Use of IV MMF immediately post-LTx may provide an immunological advantage.

摘要

据报道,在健康志愿者以及肾移植和胸器官移植患者中,口服霉酚酸酯(MMF)后霉酚酸(MPA)的生物利用度超过90%。但此类信息在肝移植(LTx)患者中有限。本研究比较了肝移植受者静脉注射(IV)和口服MMF后MPA的药代动力学。使用WinNonlin软件计算药代动力学参数。共有12例脑死亡供体肝移植患者最初接受静脉注射MMF,在开始经口喂养后2 - 7天(平均3.3±1.7天)改为口服MMF。在静脉注射或口服MMF之前和之后立即采集多份血样,并测量MPA的血浆浓度。与口服MMF相比,静脉注射MMF后的平均血浆峰值浓度和血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)显著更高(静脉注射的血浆峰值浓度为10.7±2.1μg/mL,口服为4.5±2.8μg/mL;P = 0.0001;静脉注射的AUC为28.9±7.1μg·hr/mL,口服为12.8±4.2μg·hr/mL;P = 0.0001)。MPA的口服生物利用度为48.5±18.7%。MPA的全身清除率、半衰期和稳态分布容积分别为26.9±6升/小时、5.5小时和85升。两种给药途径的终末处置半衰期无显著差异。总之,在术后早期,肝移植受者口服MMF时MPA的暴露量不到静脉注射MMF的一半。肝移植后立即使用静脉注射MMF可能具有免疫优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验