• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高能X射线电离室与水热剂量计剂量测定法的比较

A comparison of ionization-chamber and water-calorimeter dosimetry for high-energy x rays.

作者信息

Schulz R J, Huq M S, Venkataramanan N, Motakabbir K A

机构信息

Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510.

出版信息

Med Phys. 1991 Nov-Dec;18(6):1229-33. doi: 10.1118/1.596595.

DOI:10.1118/1.596595
PMID:1753908
Abstract

The temperature-regulated, flexible, water calorimeter developed in the authors' laboratory was shown previously to yield a dose-to-water from 4-MV x rays that is in very close agreement with ionization measurements made in accordance with the AAPM dosimetry protocol. The range of beam energies for this type of comparison has been increased to include 60Co, and 4-, 6- and 25-MV x rays. The grand mean of the ratios of doses obtained from the calorimeter and ionization chamber, the Cal/Ion ratio, for the four beam energies studied is 1.001 +/- 0.001. As no significant trend with beam energy was detected, it is concluded that the calorimeter and ionization chamber yield equally accurate results. Because the calibration of the calorimeter depends solely upon the accuracy with which water temperatures in the range 2-10 degrees C can be measured, and dose is given by the product of the specific heat of water and the temperature change produced by irradiation, the water calorimeter has the potential to place radiation dosimetry on a much firmer foundation than presently exists.

摘要

作者实验室研发的温度调节式、灵活的水热剂量仪先前已表明,其得出的4兆伏X射线的水吸收剂量与按照美国医学物理师协会(AAPM)剂量测定协议进行的电离测量结果非常吻合。此类比较的束流能量范围已扩大至包括钴-60以及4兆伏、6兆伏和25兆伏的X射线。在所研究的四种束流能量下,从热剂量仪和电离室获得的剂量比值(即热剂量仪/电离室比值,Cal/Ion比值)的总平均值为1.001±0.001。由于未检测到与束流能量相关的显著趋势,因此得出结论,热剂量仪和电离室产生的结果同样准确。由于热剂量仪的校准仅取决于测量2至10摄氏度范围内水温的准确度,且剂量由水的比热与辐照产生的温度变化的乘积给出,所以水热剂量仪有可能使辐射剂量测定建立在比目前更坚实的基础之上。

相似文献

1
A comparison of ionization-chamber and water-calorimeter dosimetry for high-energy x rays.高能X射线电离室与水热剂量计剂量测定法的比较
Med Phys. 1991 Nov-Dec;18(6):1229-33. doi: 10.1118/1.596595.
2
Absolute x-ray dosimetry on a synchrotron medical beam line with a graphite calorimeter.使用石墨量热计对同步加速器医用束流线上的绝对X射线剂量测定
Med Phys. 2014 May;41(5):052101. doi: 10.1118/1.4870387.
3
Water calorimeter dosimetry for 160 MeV protons.160兆电子伏特质子的水热剂量测定法
Phys Med Biol. 1992 Apr;37(4):947-53. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/37/4/009.
4
Fricke dosimetry: the difference between G(Fe3+) for 60Co gamma-rays and high-energy x-rays.弗里克剂量测定法:60Coγ射线与高能X射线的G(Fe3+)之间的差异。
Phys Med Biol. 1999 Jul;44(7):1609-24. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/7/303.
5
The new NMi orthovolt x-rays absorbed dose to water primary standard based on water calorimetry.基于水热法的新型NMi正交电压X射线对水的吸收剂量初级标准。
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Jul 7;53(13):3531-42. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/13/009. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
6
Direct measurement of electron beam quality conversion factors using water calorimetry.使用水热法直接测量电子束质量转换因子。
Med Phys. 2015 Nov;42(11):6357-68. doi: 10.1118/1.4931970.
7
Calorimetric determination of the cavity-gas calibration factor Ngas.量热法测定腔室气体校准因子Ngas。
Med Phys. 1985 Mar-Apr;12(2):166-8. doi: 10.1118/1.595758.
8
Absorbed dose determination with a water calorimeter in comparison with an ionisation chamber.
Phys Med Biol. 1983 Dec;28(12):1391-9. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/28/12/004.
9
Commissioning of an NRC-type sealed water calorimeter at METAS using 60Co gamma-rays.在瑞士计量研究院(METAS)使用钴-60伽马射线对一台NRC型密封水热计进行调试。
Phys Med Biol. 2004 Sep 7;49(17):4073-86. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/17/017.
10
Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.临床高能电子束参考剂量学:AAPM TG - 51与AAPM TG - 21剂量学协议的比较
Med Phys. 2001 Oct;28(10):2077-87. doi: 10.1118/1.1405841.