Ficarra Vincenzo, Galfano Antonio, Mancini Mariangela, Martignoni Guido, Artibani Walter
Department of Oncological and Surgical Sciences, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):554-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70173-0.
The Tumour, Nodes, and Metastasis (TNM) staging system is a method of stratifying patients with cancer and is based on data obtained from large multicentre studies that involved large numbers of patients, and have a good level of evidence. However, despite continual revisions to the methodology to incorporate evidence from new clinical studies, the optimum stratification of patients with renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) using the TNM staging system remains controversial and further revisions, in our opinion, are needed. Revision of the TNM staging system for renal-cell cancer could also result in the simultaneous update of the integrated prognostic systems that are currently used along side this traditional method of staging. These integrated systems could become key instruments for guiding patient counselling, for appropriate follow up strategies, for patient selection for clinical trials, and for appropriate assessment of results if the perception that they are complex is overcome. This perception is driven by the presence of more than one system, the heterogeneity of clinical and pathological variables included in the methodology, and the need for robust comparative studies between the various systems. Therefore, in everyday clinical practice, the TNM system is regarded as a more reliable method of staging. In this Essay, we aim to highlight the problems associated with the current version of the TNM staging system and highlight areas in which this grading instrument can be improved in future to become a more refined and standardised method of communication between all clinicians involved in clinical management of RCC.
肿瘤、淋巴结和转移(TNM)分期系统是一种对癌症患者进行分层的方法,它基于从涉及大量患者的大型多中心研究中获得的数据,且证据水平较高。然而,尽管不断修订方法以纳入新临床研究的证据,但使用TNM分期系统对肾细胞癌(RCC)患者进行最佳分层仍存在争议,我们认为还需要进一步修订。肾细胞癌TNM分期系统的修订也可能导致目前与这种传统分期方法同时使用的综合预后系统的同步更新。如果克服了它们复杂的这种认知,这些综合系统可能会成为指导患者咨询、制定适当随访策略、选择临床试验患者以及适当评估结果的关键工具。这种认知是由多个系统的存在、方法中纳入的临床和病理变量的异质性以及各系统之间进行有力比较研究的必要性所驱动的。因此,在日常临床实践中,TNM系统被视为一种更可靠的分期方法。在本文中,我们旨在突出当前版本的TNM分期系统存在的问题,并强调该分级工具未来可以改进的领域,以成为参与RCC临床管理的所有临床医生之间更精确和标准化的沟通方法。