Mattozo Carlos A, De Salles Antonio A F, Klement Ivan A, Gorgulho Alessandra, McArthur David, Ford Judith M, Agazaryan Nzhde, Kelly Daniel F, Selch Michael T
Division of Neurosurgery, University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
J Neurosurg. 2007 May;106(5):846-54. doi: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.5.846.
The authors analyzed the results of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for the treatment of recurrent meningiomas that were described at initial resection as showing aggressive, atypical, or malignant features (nonbenign).
Twenty-five patients who underwent SRS and/or SRT for nonbenign meningiomas between December 1992 and August 2004 were included. Thirteen of these patients underwent treatment for multiple primary or recurrent lesions. In all, 52 tumors were treated. All histological sections were reviewed and reclassified according to World Health Organization (WHO) 2000 guidelines as benign (Grade I), atypical (Grade II), or anaplastic (Grade III) meningiomas. The median follow-up period was 42 months. Seventeen (68%) of the cases were reclassified as follows: WHO Grade I (five cases), Grade II (11 cases), and Grade III (one case). Malignant progression occurred in eight cases (32%) during the follow-up period; these cases were considered as a separate group. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates for the Grades I, II, and III, and malignant progression groups were 100, 83, 0, and 11%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the Grade II group, the 3-year PFS rates for patients treated with SRS and SRT were 100 and 33%, respectively (p = 0.1). After initial treatment, 22 new tumors required treatment using SRS or SRT; 17 (77%) of them occurred inside the original resection cavity. Symptomatic edema developed in one patient (4%).
Stereotactic radiation treatment provided effective local control of "aggressive" Grade I and Grade II meningiomas, whereas Grade III lesions were associated with poor outcome. The outcome of cases in the malignant progression group was intermediate between that of the Grade II and Grade III groups, with the lesions showing a tendency toward malignancy.
作者分析了立体定向放射外科(SRS)和立体定向放射治疗(SRT)治疗复发性脑膜瘤的结果,这些复发性脑膜瘤在初次切除时被描述为具有侵袭性、非典型或恶性特征(非良性)。
纳入1992年12月至2004年8月间接受SRS和/或SRT治疗非良性脑膜瘤的25例患者。其中13例患者接受了多原发性或复发性病变的治疗。总共治疗了52个肿瘤。所有组织学切片均根据世界卫生组织(WHO)2000年指南进行复查并重新分类为良性(I级)、非典型(II级)或间变性(III级)脑膜瘤。中位随访期为42个月。17例(68%)病例重新分类如下:WHO I级(5例)、II级(11例)和III级(1例)。随访期间8例(32%)发生恶性进展;这些病例被视为一个单独的组。I级、II级、III级和恶性进展组的3年无进展生存率(PFS)分别为100%、83%、0%和11%(p<0.001)。在II级组中,接受SRS和SRT治疗的患者的3年PFS率分别为100%和33%(p = 0.1)。初次治疗后,22个新肿瘤需要使用SRS或SRT治疗;其中17个(77%)发生在原切除腔内。1例患者(4%)出现症状性水肿。
立体定向放射治疗对“侵袭性”I级和II级脑膜瘤提供了有效的局部控制,而III级病变预后较差。恶性进展组病例的结果介于II级和III级组之间,病变显示出恶性倾向。