Mizutani Yuka, Hori Yusuke S, Harary Paul M, Lam Fred C, Reesh Deyaaldeen Abu, Emrich Sara C, Ustrzynski Louisa, Tayag Armine, Park David J, Chang Steven D
Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 23;17(17):2750. doi: 10.3390/cancers17172750.
: Recurrent meningiomas remain difficult to manage due to the absence of effective systemic therapies and comparatively high treatment failure rates, particularly in high-grade tumors. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers a minimally-invasive and precise option, particularly for tumors in surgically complex locations. However, the risks associated with re-irradiation, and recent changes in the WHO classification of CNS tumors highlight the need for more personalized and strategic treatment approaches. This systematic review evaluates the safety, efficacy, and clinical considerations for use of SRS for recurrent meningiomas. : In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies reporting outcomes of SRS in recurrent, pathologically confirmed intracranial meningiomas. Studies were excluded if they were commentaries, reviews, case reports with fewer than three cases, or had inaccessible full text. The quality and risk of bias of the included studies were assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data on patient and tumor characteristics, SRS treatment parameters, clinical outcomes, adverse effects, and statistical analysis results were extracted. : Sixteen studies were included. For WHO Grade I tumors, 3- to 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 85% to 100%. Grade II meningiomas demonstrated more variable outcomes, with 3-year PFS ranging from 23% to 100%. Grade III tumors had consistently poorer outcomes, with reported 1-year and 2-year PFS rates as low as 0% and 46%, respectively. SRS performed after surgery alone was associated with superior outcomes, with local control rates of 79% to 100% and 5-year PFS ranging from 40.4% to 91%. In contrast, tumors previously treated with radiotherapy, with or without surgery, showed substantially poorer outcomes, with 3- to 5-year PFS ranging from 26% to 41% and local control rates as low as 31%. Among patients with prior radiotherapy, outcomes were particularly poor in Grade II and III recurrent tumors. Toxicity rates ranged from 3.7% to 37%, and were generally higher for patients with prior radiation. Predictors of worse PFS included prior radiation, older age, and Grade III histology. : SRS may represent a reasonable salvage option for carefully selected patients with recurrent meningioma, particularly following surgery alone. Outcomes were notably worse in high-grade recurrent meningiomas following prior radiotherapy, emphasizing the prognostic significance of both histological grade and treatment history. Notably, the lack of molecular and genetic data in most existing studies represents a key limitation in the current literature. Future prospective studies incorporating molecular profiling may improve risk stratification and support more personalized treatment strategies.
由于缺乏有效的全身治疗方法以及相对较高的治疗失败率,复发性脑膜瘤的治疗仍然具有挑战性,尤其是在高级别肿瘤中。立体定向放射外科(SRS)提供了一种微创且精确的选择,特别是对于手术复杂部位的肿瘤。然而,与再次放疗相关的风险以及世界卫生组织(WHO)中枢神经系统肿瘤分类的最新变化凸显了采用更个性化和策略性治疗方法的必要性。本系统评价评估了SRS用于复发性脑膜瘤的安全性、有效性及临床考量因素。
根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,利用PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库进行了系统的文献检索,以查找报告SRS治疗经病理证实的复发性颅内脑膜瘤结果的研究。若研究为评论、综述、病例数少于3例的病例报告或无法获取全文,则将其排除。使用改良的纽卡斯尔 - 渥太华量表评估纳入研究的质量和偏倚风险。提取了患者和肿瘤特征、SRS治疗参数、临床结局、不良反应及统计分析结果的数据。
共纳入16项研究。对于WHO I级肿瘤,3至5年无进展生存期(PFS)为85%至100%。II级脑膜瘤的结果差异更大,3年PFS为23%至100%。III级肿瘤的结局一直较差,报告的1年和2年PFS率分别低至0%和46%。仅在手术后进行SRS与更好的结局相关,局部控制率为79%至100%,5年PFS为40.4%至91%。相比之下,先前接受过放疗(无论是否接受过手术)的肿瘤显示出明显更差的结局,3至5年PFS为26%至41%,局部控制率低至31%。在先前接受过放疗的患者中,II级和III级复发性肿瘤的结局尤其差。毒性发生率为3.7%至37%,先前接受过放疗的患者通常更高。PFS较差的预测因素包括先前放疗、年龄较大和III级组织学。
对于精心挑选的复发性脑膜瘤患者,尤其是仅在手术后复发的患者,SRS可能是一种合理的挽救选择。先前接受放疗后的高级别复发性脑膜瘤结局明显更差,强调了组织学分级和治疗史的预后意义。值得注意的是,大多数现有研究缺乏分子和遗传数据是当前文献中的一个关键限制。未来纳入分子谱分析的前瞻性研究可能会改善风险分层并支持更个性化的治疗策略。