• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球生物制药行业与印度跨国制药公司的崛起:对澳大利亚仿制药政策的影响

The global biopharma industry and the rise of Indian drug multinationals: implications for Australian generics policy.

作者信息

Löfgren Hans

机构信息

School of International and Political Studies, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007 Jun 1;4:10. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-10.

DOI:10.1186/1743-8462-4-10
PMID:17543115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1896171/
Abstract

This article provides a synopsis of the new dynamics of the global biopharma industry. The emergence of global generics companies with capabilities approximating those of 'big pharma' has accelerated the blurring of boundaries between the innovator and generics sectors. Biotechnology-based products form a large and growing segment of prescription drug markets and regulatory pathways for biogenerics are imminent. Indian biopharma multinationals with large-scale efficient manufacturing plants and growing R&D capabilities are now major suppliers of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) and generic drugs across both developed and developing countries. In response to generic competition, innovator companies employ a range of life cycle management techniques, including the launch of 'authorised generics'. The generics segment in Australia will see high growth rates in coming years but the prospect for local manufacturing is bleak. The availability of cheap generics in international markets has put pressure on Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) pricing arrangements, and a new policy direction was announced in November 2006. Lower generics prices will have a negative impact on some incumbent suppliers but industrial renewal policies for the medicines industry in Australia are better focused on higher value R&D activities and niche manufacturing of sophisticated products.

摘要

本文概述了全球生物制药行业的新动态。具备与“大型制药公司”相当能力的全球仿制药公司的出现,加速了创新药和仿制药领域之间界限的模糊。基于生物技术的产品在处方药市场中占据了很大且不断增长的份额,生物仿制药的监管途径即将出台。拥有大规模高效生产工厂且研发能力不断增强的印度生物制药跨国公司,如今已成为发达国家和发展中国家活性药物成分(API)和仿制药的主要供应商。为应对仿制药竞争,创新药公司采用了一系列生命周期管理技术,包括推出“授权仿制药”。澳大利亚的仿制药市场在未来几年将实现高速增长,但当地制造业的前景不容乐观。国际市场上廉价仿制药的供应给药品福利计划(PBS)的定价安排带来了压力,2006年11月宣布了一项新的政策方向。仿制药价格降低将对一些现有供应商产生负面影响,但澳大利亚医药行业的产业振兴政策应更好地聚焦于高价值研发活动和复杂产品的利基制造。

相似文献

1
The global biopharma industry and the rise of Indian drug multinationals: implications for Australian generics policy.全球生物制药行业与印度跨国制药公司的崛起:对澳大利亚仿制药政策的影响
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007 Jun 1;4:10. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-10.
2
Generic drug prices and policy in Australia: room for improvement? a comparative analysis with England.澳大利亚的仿制药价格与政策:有改进空间吗?与英国的比较分析。
Aust Health Rev. 2014 Feb;38(1):6-15. doi: 10.1071/AH12009.
3
High prices for generics in Australia - more competition might help.澳大利亚仿制药价格高昂——增加竞争或许会有所帮助。
Aust Health Rev. 2009 May;33(2):200-14. doi: 10.1071/ah090200.
4
Challenges for Australia's Bio/Nanopharma Policies: trade deals, public goods and reference pricing in sustainable industrial renewal.澳大利亚生物/纳米制药政策面临的挑战:可持续产业复兴中的贸易协定、公共产品与参考定价
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007 Jun 1;4:9. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-9.
5
Access and Affordability of Medicines in Malaysia: Need for a National Pricing Policy.马来西亚的药品可及性和可负担性:需要国家定价政策。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Oct;17(5):641-654. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00480-9.
6
Some drugs more equal than others: pseudo-generics and commercial practice.有些药物比其他药物更“平等”:伪仿制药与商业行为
Aust Health Rev. 2004 Nov 8;28(2):207-17. doi: 10.1071/ah040207.
7
[Early achievements of the Danish pharmaceutical industry-7].[丹麦制药行业的早期成就 - 7]
Theriaca. 2014(42):31-62.
8
Balancing health and industrial policy objectives in the pharmaceutical sector: lessons from Australia.平衡制药行业的健康与产业政策目标:来自澳大利亚的经验教训。
Health Policy. 2008 Aug;87(2):133-45. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.01.003. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
9
Evaluation of the In-Vitro Dissolution Permeation Systems 1 (IDAS1) as a potential tool to monitor for unexpected changes in generic medicaments in poorly regulated markets.评估体外溶出渗透系统1(IDAS1)作为监测监管不力市场中仿制药意外变化的潜在工具。
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2021 Jun 1;161:105791. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.105791. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
10
Effect of Patent Expiry on the Performance of Innovator Multinational Pharmaceutical Companies in a Low Middle Income Country.专利到期对中低收入国家创新型跨国制药公司业绩的影响。
Front Med Technol. 2022 Apr 4;4:783460. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.783460. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Some drugs more equal than others: pseudo-generics and commercial practice.有些药物比其他药物更“平等”:伪仿制药与商业行为
Aust Health Rev. 2004 Nov 8;28(2):207-17. doi: 10.1071/ah040207.
2
India's pharmaceutical industry: hype or high tech take-off?印度制药业:是炒作还是高科技腾飞?
Aust Health Rev. 2004 Nov 8;28(2):182-93. doi: 10.1071/ah040182.
3
Generic drugs: international trends and policy developments in Australia.仿制药:澳大利亚的国际趋势与政策发展
Aust Health Rev. 2004;27(1):39-48. doi: 10.1071/ah042710039.
4
The changing structure of the pharmaceutical industry.制药行业不断变化的结构。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jan-Feb;23(1):10-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.1.10.