Gurpegui Manuel, Alvarez Enrique, Bousoño Manuel, Ciudad Antonio, Carlos Gómez Juan, Olivares José Manuel
Department of Psychiatry and Institute of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Av. Madrid 11, E-18071 Granada, Spain.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2007 Nov;17(11):725-34. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2007.04.003. Epub 2007 May 31.
To compare olanzapine and risperidone outcome on some neurocognitive dimensions in chronic schizophrenia patients with prominent negative symptoms.
We randomised and followed for 1 year 235 chronic schizophrenia outpatients with a SANS global score > or =10 to open-label flexible-dose treatment with olanzapine or risperidone. Clinical, functional and cognitive assessments [including the COGLAB battery reaction time, vigilance-span of apprehension (VSA) and a card-sorting task] were done periodically.
There were no significant differences between olanzapine (n=120) and risperidone (n=115) treatments in the neurocognitive dimensions tested. Mean+/-SD doses were 12.2+/-5.8 mg/day of olanzapine and 4.9+/-2.0 mg/day of risperidone. Patients in the olanzapine group showed a significant improvement in the VSA total score, but the within-group change was modest (effect size of 0.26); the difference with the risperidone group was not significant (p=0.207). Patients in both groups showed a significant improvement in a composite measure of executive efficiency based on the card-sorting task, with within-group effect size of 0.21 (risperidone) and 0.35 (olanzapine); the between-group difference was not significant (p=0.164). At baseline, better functional status correlated with VSA. Patients scoring lower on VSA or executive efficiency at baseline improved more on these respective measures.
Modest pro-cognitive effects can also be found in chronic schizophrenia outpatients with prominent negative symptoms when treated with olanzapine or risperidone.
比较奥氮平和利培酮对伴有显著阴性症状的慢性精神分裂症患者某些神经认知维度的疗效。
我们将235例阳性与阴性症状量表(SANS)总分≥10分的慢性精神分裂症门诊患者随机分组,给予奥氮平或利培酮开放标签的灵活剂量治疗,并随访1年。定期进行临床、功能和认知评估[包括COGLAB电池反应时间、警觉性注意广度(VSA)和一项卡片分类任务]。
在测试的神经认知维度上,奥氮平组(n = 120)和利培酮组(n = 115)治疗之间没有显著差异。奥氮平的平均±标准差剂量为12.2±5.8毫克/天,利培酮为4.9±2.0毫克/天。奥氮平组患者的VSA总分有显著改善,但组内变化较小(效应大小为0.26);与利培酮组的差异不显著(p = 0.207)。两组患者基于卡片分类任务的执行效率综合测量均有显著改善,组内效应大小分别为0.21(利培酮)和0.35(奥氮平);组间差异不显著(p = 0.164)。在基线时,更好的功能状态与VSA相关。在基线时VSA或执行效率得分较低的患者在这些相应测量指标上改善更大。
在用奥氮平或利培酮治疗伴有显著阴性症状的慢性精神分裂症门诊患者时,也可发现适度的促认知作用。