Suppr超能文献

普通外科护理流程与结构与术后结局的关系:描述性分析

Relationship of processes and structures of care in general surgery to postoperative outcomes: a descriptive analysis.

作者信息

Main Deborah S, Henderson William G, Pratte Katherine, Cavender Tia A, Schifftner Tracy L, Kinney Anne, Stoner Tamara, Steiner John F, Fink Aaron S, Khuri Shukri F

机构信息

Colorado Health Outcomes Program, Aurora, CO 80045-0508, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jun;204(6):1157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The systematic collection of quantitative data on structures and processes from surgical services participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) has not been a focus to date. Efficient collection of useful measures of structures and processes may improve understanding of surgical outcomes and strategies for improving the quality of surgical care, as NSQIP continues to expand. The purpose of this article was to describe results of a quantitative survey designed to measure surgical care structures and processes within NSQIP sites.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey was mailed to 123 Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) and 14 private sector sites participating in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-funded Patient Safety in Surgery (PSS) Study. The survey included questions about organizational structures and processes of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative general surgical care services. For this study, we included only data from 90 VA sites that returned a survey (73% response rate). We used descriptive statistics and examined the bivariate association of structures and processes items or scales with risk-adjusted observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios of surgical morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Examination of frequency or means and standard deviations of items and scales revealed substantial variation in the structures and processes of surgical care services in participating VA sites, with correlation analyses demonstrating that, of 35 process and structure variables, there was a statistically significant relationship with the hospital's observed-to-expected ratio for 14 variables for morbidity, but only 4 variables for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This descriptive analysis provides support for the potential importance of measuring organizational structures and processes of care in addition to risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality.

摘要

背景

迄今为止,参与国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)的外科服务机构在系统收集有关结构和流程的定量数据方面尚未成为重点。随着NSQIP的不断扩展,有效收集有用的结构和流程指标可能会增进对外科手术结果的理解以及改善外科护理质量的策略。本文的目的是描述一项旨在测量NSQIP站点内外科护理结构和流程的定量调查结果。

研究设计

向123个退伍军人事务部(VA)部门和14个参与由医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)资助的手术患者安全(PSS)研究的私营部门站点邮寄了一份横断面调查问卷。该调查包括有关术前、术中和术后普通外科护理服务的组织结构和流程的问题。在本研究中,我们仅纳入了90个回复调查问卷的VA站点的数据(回复率为73%)。我们使用描述性统计方法,并检查了结构和流程项目或量表与手术发病率和死亡率的风险调整观察与预期(O/E)比率之间的双变量关联。

结果

对项目和量表的频率、均值及标准差进行检查后发现,参与研究的VA站点的外科护理服务在结构和流程方面存在很大差异,相关性分析表明,在35个流程和结构变量中,有14个变量与医院的发病率观察与预期比率存在统计学显著关系,但与死亡率相关的变量仅有4个。

结论

除了风险调整后的发病率和死亡率外,这项描述性分析为测量护理的组织结构和流程的潜在重要性提供了支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验